References
Almeida, F., & Deutsch, N. (2025). Urban living labs as catalysts for innovation: Advancing urban ecosystems within the quintuple helix model. Urban Governance, 5(2), 133-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2025.05.005
Search via ReFindit
Arioz, U., Bratina, B., Mlakar, I., Plohl, N., Uran, S., Roj, I. R., Šafarič, R., & Šafran, V. (2024). Unlocking the power of socially assistive robotic nurses in hospitals through innovative living lab methodology. Health Informatics Journal, 30(4), 14604582241291380. https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582241291380
Search via ReFindit
Ascione, G. S., Cuomo, F., Mariotti, N., & Corazza, L. (2021). Urban Living Labs, Circular Economy and Nature-Based Solutions: Ideation and testing of a new soil in the city of Turin using a multi-stakeholder perspective. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 1(2), 545-562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00011-6
Search via ReFindit
AUC. (2014, February 4). AUC launches new Research Institute for a Sustainable Environment | The American University in Cairo. Retrieved January 15, 2026, from https://www.aucegypt.edu/media/media-releases/auc-launches-new-research-institute-sustainable-environment
Search via ReFindit
Ballon, P., Pierson, J., & Delaere, S. (2005). Test and Experimentation Platforms for broadband innovation: Examining European practice. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1331557
Search via ReFindit
Ballon, P., Van Hoed, M., & Schuurman, D. (2018). The effectiveness of involving users in digital innovation: Measuring the impact of living labs. Telematics and Informatics, 35(5), 1201-1214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.02.003
Search via ReFindit
Beaudoin, C., Joncoux, S., Jasmin, J., Berberi, A., McPhee, C., Schillo, R. S., & Nguyen, V. M. (2022). A research agenda for evaluating living labs as an open innovation model for environmental and agricultural sustainability. Environmental Challenges, 7, 100505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2022.100505
Search via ReFindit
Bhatta, A., Vreugdenhil, H. S., Ellen, G. J., Schuurman, D., & Slinger, J. H. (2025). Influence of living labs in the policy landscape. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5534753
Search via ReFindit
Bhatta, A., Vreugdenhil, H., & Slinger, J. (2023). Characterizing nature-based living labs from their seeds in the past. Environmental Development, 49, 100959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2023.100959
Search via ReFindit
Blezer, S., & Abujidi, N. (2021). Urban Living Labs and Transformative Changes: A qualitative study to the triadic relationship between financing, stakeholder roles and outcomes of Urban Living Labs on their impact creation in the city of Groningen, the Netherlands. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(9/10), 73-87. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1466
Search via ReFindit
Bolton, P., Musca, X., & Samama, F. (2020). Global Public‐Private Investment Partnerships: A Financing Innovation with Positive Social Impact. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 32(2), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12403
Search via ReFindit
Braulio-Gonzalo, M., & Bovea, M. D. (2019). Relationship between green public procurement criteria and sustainability assessment tools applied to office buildings. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 81, 106310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106310
Search via ReFindit
Bui, T. D., Tsai, F. M., Tseng, M., & Ali, M. H. (2019). Identifying sustainable solid waste management barriers in practice using the fuzzy Delphi method. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 154, 104625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104625
Search via ReFindit
Ceseracciu, C., Branca, G., Deriu, R., & Roggero, P. P. (2023). Using the right words or using the words right? Re-conceptualising living labs for systemic innovation in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Rural Studies, 104, 103154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.103154
Search via ReFindit
Choe, Y., & Kim, N. (2024). From the classroom to the Living Lab for developing competencies in tourism higher education. Journal of Hospitality Leisure Sport & Tourism Education, 35, 100511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2024.100511
Search via ReFindit
Christensen, T., Fimreite, A. L., & Lægreid, P. (2007). Reform of the employment and welfare administrations the challenges of co-coordinating diverse public organizations. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(3), 389–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852307081149
Search via ReFindit
Criado, J. I., Dias, T. F., Sano, H., Rojas-Martín, F., Silvan, A., & Filho, A. I. (2020). Public Innovation and Living Labs in Action: A Comparative Analysis in Post-New Public Management Contexts. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(6), 451-464. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1729181
Search via ReFindit
Cuomo, F. (2022). Urban Living Lab: An experimental Co-Production tool to foster the circular economy. Social Sciences, 11(6), 260. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11060260
Search via ReFindit
Dabaieh, M., Mahdy, D. E., & Maguid, D. (2018). Living labs as a pedagogical teaching tool for green building design and construction in hot arid regions. International Journal of Architectural Research Archnet-IJAR, 12(1), 338. https://doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v12i1.1285
Search via ReFindit
De Miranda Ribeiro, F., & Kruglianskas, I. (2012). Improving environmental permitting through performance-based regulation: a case study of Sao Paulo State, Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 46, 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.09.017
Search via ReFindit
Dekker, R., Contreras, J. F., & Meijer, A. (2019). The Living Lab as a Methodology for Public Administration Research: a Systematic Literature Review of its Applications in the Social Sciences. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(14), 1207-1217. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1668410
Search via ReFindit
Dekker, R., Geuijen, K., & Oliver, C. (2021). Tensions of evaluating innovation in a living lab: Moving beyond actionable knowledge production. Evaluation, 27(3), 347-363. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389021997848
Search via ReFindit
Dewika, M., Markandan, K., Ruwaida, J. N., Sara, Y., Deb, A., Irfan, N. A., & Khalid, M. (2024). Integrating the quintuple helix approach into atmospheric microplastics management policies for planetary health preservation. The Science of the Total Environment, 954, 176063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176063
Search via ReFindit
Egypt Vision 2030. (2016). Sdsegypt2030. Retrieved January 2, 2026, from http://sdsegypt2030.com/
Search via ReFindit
Engez, A., Leminen, S., & Aarikka-Stenroos, L. (2021). Urban Living Lab as a Circular Economy Ecosystem: Advancing Environmental Sustainability through Economic Value, Material, and Knowledge Flows. Sustainability, 13(5), 2811. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052811
Search via ReFindit
Evans, S., & Scarbrough, H. (2014). Supporting knowledge translation through collaborative translational research initiatives: ‘Bridging’ versus ‘blurring’ boundary-spanning approaches in the UK CLAHRC initiative. Social Science & Medicine, 106, 119-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.025
Search via ReFindit
Fan, X., Wargocki, P., Silvestri, A., Borkowski, E., & Schlueter, A. (2025). Mediating effects of ventilation on the impacts of temperature on human comfort, health and cognitive performance: A living lab study. Building and Environment, 285, 113587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113587
Search via ReFindit
Finkbeiner, M. (2014). The International Standards as the Constitution of Life Cycle Assessment: The ISO 14040 Series and its Offspring. In LCA compendium (pp. 85–106). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8697-3_3
Search via ReFindit
Fuglsang, L., & Hansen, A. V. (2021). Framing improvements of public innovation in a living lab context: Processual learning, restrained space and democratic engagement. Research Policy, 51(1), 104390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104390
Search via ReFindit
Gascó, M. (2016). Living labs: Implementing open innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.09.003
Search via ReFindit
Georghiou, L., Edler, J., Uyarra, E., & Yeow, J. (2013). Policy instruments for public procurement of innovation: Choice, design and assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 86, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.018
Search via ReFindit
Gilbert, S., Mathias, R., Schönfelder, A., Wekenborg, M., Steinigen-Fuchs, J., Dillenseger, A., & Ziemssen, T. (2025). A roadmap for safe, regulation-compliant Living Labs for AI and digital health development. Science Advances, 11(20). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adv7719
Search via ReFindit
Haug, N., & Mergel, I. (2021). Public Value Co-Creation in Living Labs Results from Three Case Studies. Administrative Sciences, 11(3), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11030074
Search via ReFindit
He, D., Deng, H., Niu, Y., Li, J., Zainol, R., & Azali, N. S. (2025). Governing sustainable urban brownfield redevelopment in China: Applying the Quintuple Helix model in Chengdu. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 17(1), 103855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2025.103855
Search via ReFindit
Heigl, F., Kieslinger, B., Paul, K. T., Uhlik, J., Frigerio, D., & Dörler, D. (2020). Co-Creating and implementing quality criteria for citizen science. Citizen Science Theory and Practice, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.294
Search via ReFindit
Hernberg, H., & Hyysalo, S. (2024). Modes of intermediation: How intermediaries engage in advancing local bottom-up experimentation. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 51, 100849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2024.100849
Search via ReFindit
Herth, A., Verburg, R., & Blok, K. (2024). How can campus living labs thrive to reach sustainable solutions? Cleaner Production Letters, 8, 100078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clpl.2024.100078
Search via ReFindit
Hossain, M., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. (2018). A systematic review of living lab literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 976-988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.257
Search via ReFindit
James, P., McWherter, B., & Westwood, A. R. (2025). Exploring co-production through engagement between scientists and producers in an agricultural living lab: A case study in Canada. Journal of Rural Studies, 119, 103777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103777
Search via ReFindit
Leminen, S., Rajahonka, M., Westerlund, M., & Hossain, M. (2021). Collaborative innovation for sustainability in Nordic cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 328, 129549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129549
Search via ReFindit
Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., & Nyström, A. (2012). Living Labs as Open-Innovation Networks. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9), 6-11. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/602
Search via ReFindit
Lhoest, S., Kelman, C. C., Barton, C. J., Beaudette, J., & Gerber, L. R. (2024). The impact factor of engaged research: Metrics for conservation outcomes. Biological Conservation, 292, 110534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110534
Search via ReFindit
Lin, Y., Lin, Y., Lin, Y., Lin, Y., Liu, J., Tan, Z., & Han, W. (2025). Triple Helix Synergy Model in China’s new technology diplomacy: Perspectives from AI startups. Telecommunications Policy, 50(1), 103079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103079
Search via ReFindit
Loignon, C., Dupéré, S., Leblanc, C., Truchon, K., Bouchard, A., Arsenault, J., Carvalho, J. P., Boudreault-Fournier, A., & Marcotte, S. A. (2021). Equity and inclusivity in research: co-creation of a digital platform with representatives of marginalized populations to enhance the involvement in research of people with limited literacy skills. Research Involvement and Engagement, 7(1), 70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-021-00313-x
Search via ReFindit
López-De-Alba, P. L., Rodríguez-Carvajal, R. A., Isiordia-Lachica, P. C., Segoviano, F. J. V., Hidalgo, J. a. R., & Puente, O. T. (2026). The five-blade propeller: An evolutionary model of innovation with sustainability as the rotor (SPIRAL). Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity, 12(1), 100738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2026.100738
Search via ReFindit
Mačiulienė, M., & Skaržauskienė, A. (2020). Sustainable urban innovations: digital co-creation in European living labs. Kybernetes, 49(7), 1969-1986. https://doi.org/10.1108/k-07-2019-0514
Search via ReFindit
Maruccia, Y., Solazzo, G., Del Vecchio, P., & Passiante, G. (2020). Evidence from Network Analysis application to Innovation Systems and Quintuple Helix. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120306
Search via ReFindit
Masseck, T. (2017). Living Labs in Architecture as Innovation Arenas within Higher Education Institutions. Energy Procedia, 115, 383-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.05.035
Search via ReFindit
McPhee, C., Bancerz, M., Mambrini-Doudet, M., Chrétien, F., Huyghe, C., & Gracia-Garza, J. (2021). The defining characteristics of agroecosystem living labs. Sustainability, 13(4), 1718. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041718
Search via ReFindit
Mollen, J. (2024). Towards a research ethics of real-world experimentation with emerging technology. Journal of Responsible Technology, 20, 100098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2024.100098
Search via ReFindit
Mukherjee, A. S., Sahay, S., Kumar, R., Banta, R., & Joshi, N. (2023). “A living lab within a lab”: approaches and challenges for scaling digital public health in resource-constrained settings. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1187069. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1187069
Search via ReFindit
NATAE. (2025, October). Launch of Luxor Living Lab, in Egypt. Natae. https://www.natae-agroecology.eu/launch-of-luxor-living-lab-in-egypt/
Search via ReFindit
Owen, R., & Mason, C. (2016). The role of government co-investment funds in the supply of entrepreneurial finance: An assessment of the early operation of the UK Angel Co-investment Fund. Environment and Planning C Politics and Space, 35(3), 434-456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774x16667072
Search via ReFindit
Paskaleva, K., & Cooper, I. (2021). Are living labs effective? Exploring the evidence. Technovation, 106, 102311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102311
Search via ReFindit
Pisello, A. L., Amer, T. M., & Pioppi, B. (2025). Ten questions concerning living laboratories (LL) for multi-domain comfort investigations. Building and Environment, 276, 112750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112750
Search via ReFindit
Racine, E., D’Anjou, B., Dallaire, C., Dumez, V., Favron‐Godbout, C., Hudon, A., Montreuil, M., Olivier, C., Quintal, A., & Chenel, V. (2023). Developing a living lab in ethics: Initial issues and observations. Bioethics, 38(2), 153-163. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13246
Search via ReFindit
Rageh, R. (2024). Civic university model as living lab: potential and challenges. Multidisciplinary Adaptive Climate Insights, 1(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.21622/maci.2024.01.1.832
Search via ReFindit
Rahman, N. H., & Kamauzaman, T. H. T. (2022). Developing Key performance Indicators for Emergency Department of Teaching Hospitals: a mixed fuzzy Delphi and nominal group technique approach. Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences, 29(2), 114-125. https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms2022.29.2.11
Search via ReFindit
Ranchordás, S. (2021). Experimental regulations and regulatory sandboxes – law without order? Law And Method. https://doi.org/10.5553/rem/.000064
Search via ReFindit
Riaño-Herrera, D. A., Romero-Perdomo, F., Quintero-Castro, J., García-Sánchez, A., & Rodríguez-Urrego, L. (2025). Exploring the design and contributions of urban agroecosystem living labs for sustainable city development. Sustainable Futures, 10, 100976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100976
Search via ReFindit
Ruijer, E. (2021). Designing and implementing data collaboratives: A governance perspective. Government Information Quarterly, 38(4), 101612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101612
Search via ReFindit
Ruijer, E., & Meijer, A. (2019). Open Government Data as an Innovation Process: Lessons from a Living Lab Experiment. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(3), 613-635. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2019.1568884
Search via ReFindit
Sala, A., Landoni, P., & Verganti, R. (2015). Small and Medium Enterprises collaborations with knowledge intensive services: an explorative analysis of the impact of innovation vouchers. R & D Management, 46(S1), 291-302. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12196
Search via ReFindit
Santos, J. C. D. (2026). Regular orders for triangular fuzzy numbers and the weak law of trichotomy. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 532, 109790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2026.109790
Search via ReFindit
Sarkki, S., Pihlajamäki, M., Soini, K., Ojala, A., Kluvankova, T., Spacek, M., Mishra, H., & Hiedanpää, J. (2025). Integrative literature review on co-concepts in connection with nature-based solutions. Environmental Science & Policy, 169, 104073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104073
Search via ReFindit
SEEDS Project (Ed.). (2025). Living Lab launched in Egypt to strengthen grain supply chain resilience. Seeds. https://seeds-prima.eu/living-lab-launched-in-egypt-to-strengthen-grain-supply-chain-resilience/
Search via ReFindit
Sekem. (2025). SUS-SOIL Project: Sustainable soil and subsoil Management. https://www.sus-soil.eu/
Search via ReFindit
Selviaridis, K., & Spring, M. (2024). Innovation intermediation in supply networks: Addressing shortfalls in buyer and supplier capabilities for collaborative innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 71(1), 40-80. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1345
Search via ReFindit
Shin, J., Lee, J. Y., Cho, E., Kang, B., & Choi, J. Y. (2025). Implications of a collaborative production process based on the living lab approach for older adults’ health: An integrative review. Geriatric Nursing, 66(Pt C), 103639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2025.103639
Search via ReFindit
Stuckrath, C., Rosales-Carreón, J., & Worrell, E. (2025). Conceptualisation of Campus Living Labs for the sustainability transition: An integrative literature review. Environmental Development, 54, 101143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101143
Search via ReFindit
Sudoi, A., De Vries, J., & Kamuya, D. (2021). A scoping review of considerations and practices for benefit sharing in biobanking. BMC Medical Ethics, 22(1), 102. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00671-x
Search via ReFindit
Toso, F., Brankaert, R., Hendriks, N., Lenaerts, L., & Wilkinson, A. (2023). Reflecting on Living Labs as Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Networks to Evaluate Technological Products for People Living with Dementia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(3), 1673. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20031673
Search via ReFindit
Tuni, A., Ijomah, W. L., Gutteridge, F., Mirpourian, M., Pfeifer, S., & Copani, G. (2023). Risk assessment for circular business models: A fuzzy Delphi study application for composite materials. Journal of Cleaner Production, 389, 135722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135722
Search via ReFindit
Van Engelenhoven, A. M., Geiger, J. L., Ünal, A. B., Spinder, R., & Van Der Zande, I. S. (2023). Student perceptions of Living Lab research internships in the COVID-19 pandemic – a Dutch case study. Education + Training, 65(10), 65-80. https://doi.org/10.1108/et-06-2022-0236
Search via ReFindit
Van Geenhuizen, M. (2016). Living Labs as boundary-spanners between Triple Helix actors. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, 15(1), 78-97. https://doi.org/10.17477/jcea.2016.15.1.078
Search via ReFindit
Van Geenhuizen, M. (2018). A framework for the evaluation of living labs as boundary spanners in innovation. Environment and Planning C Politics and Space, 36(7), 1280-1298. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654417753623
Search via ReFindit
Van Winden, W., & Carvalho, L. (2019). Intermediation in public procurement of innovation: How Amsterdam’s startup-in-residence programme connects startups to urban challenges. Research Policy, 48(9), 103789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.013
Search via ReFindit
Von Wirth, T., Fuenfschilling, L., Frantzeskaki, N., & Coenen, L. (2018). Impacts of urban living labs on sustainability transitions: mechanisms and strategies for systemic change through experimentation. European Planning Studies, 27(2), 229-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1504895
Search via ReFindit
Voorwinden, A., Van Bueren, E., & Verhoef, L. (2023). Experimenting with collaboration in the Smart City: Legal and governance structures of Urban Living Labs. Government Information Quarterly, 40(4), 101875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101875
Search via ReFindit
Westerlund, M., Leminen, S., & Habib, C. (2018). Key constructs and a definition of living labs as innovation platforms. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(12), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1205
Search via ReFindit
Yang, B., & Park, S. (2025). Evolving Innovation Ecosystems: Longitudinal Insights into the Triple Helix Model and Enterprise Innovation in China. SAGE Open, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251393200
Search via ReFindit
Zebisch, M., Terzi, S., Pittore, M., Renner, K., & Schneiderbauer, S. (2022). Climate Impact Chains A conceptual modelling approach for climate risk assessment in the context of adaptation planning. In Springer climate (pp. 217–224). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86211-4_25
Search via ReFindit
RSS 1.0