Received: 2025-03-15  |  Accepted: 2025-05-12  |  Published: 2025-06-30

Title

E-governance in South Africa: barriers and enablers of virtual evaluation in the public sector


Abstract

Virtual Evaluation (VE) has emerged as a valuable tool in public sector monitoring and evaluation (M&E), offering opportunities to enhance efficiency, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness. The increasing emphasis on digital transformation in South Africa has led to growing interest in integrating VE into public sector evaluation processes. Despite this interest, there is limited empirical research on the factors that influence its adoption, particularly in government institutions responsible for M&E. Existing studies primarily focus on the benefits of VE, with little attention given to the challenges public officials face in implementing it effectively. This study aims to investigate the barriers and enablers affecting the adoption of VE in South Africa's public sector. Using a mixed-methods approach, the study draws insights from workshops hosted by the South African Monitoring and Evaluation Association (SAMEA), a survey with public sector officials, and key informant interviews with senior government evaluators. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Institutional Theory guide the research, which helps explain the technological and organizational dynamics influencing VE adoption. Preliminary analysis suggests that successful VE implementation depends on technological readiness, institutional support, and regulatory alignment. The study explores challenges related to digital skills, infrastructure, policy clarity, and stakeholder engagement, highlighting areas that require targeted interventions. Based on the findings, the study recommends capacity-building programs to improve digital proficiency among public officials, investment in infrastructure to support VE platforms, and policy frameworks to standardize and institutionalize VE across government departments. By addressing these challenges, public institutions can enhance the effectiveness of M&E practices and leverage digital innovations for improved governance. This study contributes to the evolving discourse on digital transformation in M&E, offering practical insights for policymakers, evaluators, and researchers working to advance evidence-based decision-making in South Africa's public sector.


Keywords

virtual evaluation, public sector evaluation, digital transformation, Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E), South Africa, Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), institutional theory, evaluation capacity-building, policy innovation, e-governance


JEL classifications

R11


URI

http://jssidoi.org/ird/article/197


DOI


Pages

84-108


Funding


This is an open access issue and all published articles are licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Authors

Matlala, Lesedi Senamele
University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa https://www.uj.ac.za
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Journal title

Insights into Regional Development

Volume

7


Number

2


Issue date

June 2025


Issue DOI


ISSN

ISSN 2345-0282 (online)


Publisher

VšĮ Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, Vilnius, Lithuania

Cited

Google Scholar

Article views & downloads

HTML views: 1014  |  PDF downloads: 472

References


African Evaluation Association (AfrEA). (2022). Strategic Plan 2022–2026: Advancing Evaluation in Africa. https://afrea.org

Search via ReFindit


Alkin, M., & Christie, C. (2012). An Evaluation Theory Tree. In Evaluation Roots. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984157.n2

Search via ReFindit


Anadon, L. D., Chan, G., Harley, A. G., Matus, K., Moon, S., Murthy, S. L., & Clark, W. C. (2016). Making technological innovation work for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525004113

Search via ReFindit


Bamberger, M. & Mabry, L. (2020). Real World Evaluation: Working Under Budget, Time, Data, and Political Constraints. Sage Publications https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071909607

Search via ReFindit


Bonfiglio, A., Camaioni, B., Carta, V., & Cristiano, S. (2023). Estimating the common agricultural policy milestones and targets by neural networks. Evaluation and Program Planning, 99, 102296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102296

Search via ReFindit


Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Search via ReFindit


Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press, 747 p. https://books.google.com/books?id=N2zQCgAAQBAJ&lpg=PP1&hl=lt&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=false

Search via ReFindit


Burgess, S., & Paguio, R. (2016). Examining ICT application adoption in Australian home-based businesses. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/jeim-02-2014-0012

Search via ReFindit


Chen, H. T. (1990). Issues in constructing program theory. New Directions for Evaluation, 47, 7-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1551

Search via ReFindit


Cheng, S. et al. (2017). Using blockchain to improve data management in the public sector. McKinsey Digital. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/using-blockchain-to-improve-data-management-in-the-public-sector

Search via ReFindit


Cintron, D. & Montrosse-Moorhead, B. (2022). Integrating Big Data into Evaluation: R Code for Topic Identification and Modeling. American Journal of Evaluation, 43(3), 412-436. https://doi.org/10.1177/10982140211031640

Search via ReFindit


Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications. https://www.ucg.ac.me/skladiste/blog_609332/objava_105202/fajlovi/Creswell.pdf

Search via ReFindit


Dammak, S., Mbarek, S., & Moalla, M. (2023). E-government, political system and COVID-19 in Africa: lessons for future disruptive shocks. Transforming Government- People Process and Policy, 17(3), 288-302. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-07-2022-0100

Search via ReFindit


Davies, P., Morris, S., & Fox, Ch. (2018). The Evaluation Market and Its Industry in England New Directions for Evaluation, 160, 29-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20347

Search via ReFindit


Dossou, T.A.M., Kambaye, E.N., Berhe, M.W., & Asongu, S.A. (2023). Moderating effect of ICT on the relationship between governance quality and income inequality in sub-Saharan Africa. Information Development https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669231170396

Search via ReFindit


Facca, D., Smith M.J., Shelley, J., Lizotte, D., & Donelle, L. (2020). Exploring the ethical issues in research using digital data collection strategies with minors: A scoping review. Plos One, 15(9), e0237875. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237875

Search via ReFindit


Fetterman, D.M., Kaftarian, Sh.J., & Wandersman, A. (Ed.) (2015). Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-Assessment, Evaluation Capacity Building, and Accountability. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483387079

Search via ReFindit


Fröhlich, K.A., Jain, K., Pinomaa, A., & Nieminen, M. (2024). Using a Public Value Management theory to identify features of citizen-centric e-governance in Namibia. South African Journal of Information Management, 26(1), Article Number a1609 https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v26i1.1609

Search via ReFindit


Funnell, S. C., & Rogers, P. J. (2011). Purposeful Program Theory: Effective Use of Theories of Change and Logic Models. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass. https://www.amazon.com/Purposeful-Program-Theory-Effective-Theories/dp/0470478578

Search via ReFindit


Garcia, O. & Kotturi, P. (Eds.). (2020). ICT for Development Evaluation. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Information-and-Communication-Technologies-for-Development-Evaluation/Garcia-Kotturi/p/book/9780367785833?srsltid=AfmBOorgmtvGuFFVlv57ZOyJPJfoI-PYebO3hp9bU2geI3rnYooWGvyg

Search via ReFindit


Gregory, M., & Wilson, J. (2018). Monitoring and evaluation. Managing and Developing Community Sport. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315561356-14/monitoring-evaluation-maxine-gregory-jayne-wilson

Search via ReFindit


Gupta, B., Dasgupta, S., & Gupta, A. (2008). Adoption of ICT in a government organization in a developing country: An empirical study. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(2), 140-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2007.12.004

Search via ReFindit


Hanaysha, J. (2016). Examining the effects of employee empowerment, teamwork, and training on organizational commitment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 229, 298-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.140

Search via ReFindit


Hejnowicz, A. & Chaplowe, S. (2021). Catching the Wave: Harnessing Data Science to Support Evaluation's Capacity for Making a Transformational Contribution to Sustainable Development Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 36(2), 162-186. https://utppublishing.com/doi/pdf/10.3138/cjpe.71527

Search via ReFindit


Kowalska-Pyzalska, A. (Ed.) (2024). Individual behavioral theories. Diffusion of Innovative Energy Services, Academic Press, 77-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822882-1.00010-X

Search via ReFindit


Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage Publications. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/focus-groups/book243860

Search via ReFindit


Letouzé, E. (2013). Could Big Data Provide Alternative Measures of Poverty and Welfare? http://www.developmentprogress.org/blog/2013/06/11/could-big-data-provide-alternative-measures-poverty-and-welfare

Search via ReFindit


McKinsey Digital (2017). Blockchain and the public sector: Improving transparency and efficiency through digital governance.

Search via ReFindit


Mobenzi (2020). MERL Tech Jozi Workshop Report. https://www.mobenzi.com/merl-techreport-2018.html

Search via ReFindit


Moodley, M, (2024). Revisiting the technology acceptance model: the influence of colonial mentality on technology acceptance. South African Journal of African Languages, 44(2), 169-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/02572117.2024.2333148

Search via ReFindit


OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/governance/digital-government-review-latin-america-caribbean.htm

Search via ReFindit


OECD. (2022). Digital Government Review of Latin America and the Caribbean: Building Inclusive and Responsive Digital Governments. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/digital-government-review-of-latin-america-and-the-caribbean_29f32e64-en.html

Search via ReFindit


Olumekor, M., Mangai, M.S., Madumo, O.S., Mohiuddin, M., & Polbitsyn, S.N. (2025). Influences on e-governance in Africa: A study of economic, political, and infrastructural dynamics. Public Administration, 103(1), 185-200. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.13013

Search via ReFindit


Paul, C., & Adams, S.O. (2024). The effect of e-government development indices (EGDI) on corruption perception index in sub-Sahara Africa: A panel data analysis. African Journal of Science Technology Innovation & Development, 16(1), 17-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2023.2247904

Search via ReFindit


Petersson, G. & Breul, J. (Eds.). (2020). Cyber Society, Big Data and Evaluation. https://www.routledge.com/Cyber-Society-Big-Data-and-Evaluation/Petersson-Breul/p/book/9781138483033?srsltid=AfmBOoqWUtisAycnAopF5U9-hO1AR44AZEbIK6dEyISh4aH3urvB6y2e

Search via ReFindit


Raftree, L. (2013, March 12). ICTs and M&E at the South Asia Conclave Evaluators’ Meeting. http://lindaraftree.com/2013/03/12/icts-and-me-at-the-south-asia-evaluators-conclave/

Search via ReFindit


Reid, A.M. (2023). Vision for an equitable AI world: The role of evaluation and evaluators to incite change. New Directions for Evaluation, 2023, 178-179. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20559

Search via ReFindit


Rogers, P.J., Petrosino, A., Huebner, T.A., & Hacsi, T.A. (2000). Program theory evaluation: Practice, promise, and problems. New Directions for Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1177

Search via ReFindit


Shapiro, J. (2016). Monitoring and evaluation: A guide for civil society organizations. CIVICUS. https://civicus.org/view/media/Monitoring%20and%20Evaluation.pdf

Search via ReFindit


UNICEF. (2023). Leveraging Digital Tools for Monitoring and Evaluation: Lessons from the COVID-19 Response. https://www.unicef.org

Search via ReFindit


United Nations (UN) Global Pulse. (2016). Integrating Big Data into the Monitoring and Evaluation of Development Programmes. http://unglobalpulse.org/sites/default/files/IntegratingBigData_intoMEDP_web_UNGP.pdf

Search via ReFindit


United Nations Global Pulse (2016). Integrating big data into the monitoring and evaluation of development programmes. http://unglobalpulse.org/sites/default/files/IntegratingBigData_intoMEDP_web_UNGP.pdf

Search via ReFindit


Walker Hudson, L. (2013). Mobile Phones in M&E: Towards Sustainable and Democratic Practice. ONTRAC Newsletter, (55), 7. http://www.intrac.org/data/files/resources/775/ONTRAC-55-New-technologies-in-monitoring-and-evaluation.pdf

Search via ReFindit


Waxa, C., & Gwaka, L.T. (2021). Social media use for public engagement during the water crisis in Cape Town. Information Polity, 26(4), 441-458. http://doi.org/10.3233/IP-200273

Search via ReFindit


Wirajing, M.A.K., & Nchofoung, T.N. (2023). The role of education in modulating the effect of ICT on governance in Africa. Education and Information Technologies, 28(9), 1987-12020. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11631-w

Search via ReFindit


World Bank. (2023). Government Digital Transformation: A Strategic Guide for the Public Sector. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/digitaldevelopment/publication/digital-transformation-in-government

Search via ReFindit