Received:
2022-03-24 | Accepted:
2022-08-09 | Published:
2022-09-30
Title
Agglomeration decay in rural areas
Abstract
Spatial proximity to other economic activities – occasionally labeled as 'market access' and 'economic density' – is associated with good economic performance. How the impulses from economic activities diminish over space is known as 'agglomeration decay' or 'distance decay'. Although market access functions and the associated agglomeration decay constitute an important topic within spatial economic research, the phenomenon is seldom studies in a rural setting or addressed by non-linear estimation techniques. In this paper, we estimate the market access function in the relatively rural regions of Southern parts of Norway. We approximate market access in the national road network by alternative market access functions with power and exponential distance decay, applying ordinary non-linear least squares (NLS) and non-linear mixed effects (NLME). We apply labor productivity as the outcome variable, employment and population as alternative measures for potential market connections and traveling time as distance measure. In the regression, we control for capital intensity, industry structure and annual growth trend, as well as mixed effect in case of the NLME model. Compared to previous findings in the literature, we find evidence of relative sharp agglomeration decay in a rural setting, involving power and exponential distance decay parameters of about 2.3 and 0.07 respectively. Comparisons of the log likelihood from the estimation of market access functions suggest that exponential distance decay involve a slightly better fit than power distance decay. In addition, employment involves slightly more explanatory power than population as a measure for potential market connections.
Keywords
Urban economics, rural economics, productivity, wider economic impacts, market access, road constructions, agglomeration decay, distance decay
JEL classifications
D24
, F15
, O18
, R11
, R12
, R42
URI
http://jssidoi.org/ird/article/111
DOI
HAL
Pages
139-155
Funding
The paper was funded by the Research Council of Norway, partially through the program, the 'Industrial PhD-Program', and partially through the research project 'Impact' on wider economic impacts.
This is an open access issue and all published articles are licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
Behrens, K., Duranton, G., & Robert-Nicoud, F. 2014. Productive Cities: Sorting, Selection and Agglomeration. Journal of Political Economy, 122(3), 507-553. https://doi.org/10.1086/675534
Search via ReFindit
Blomgren, A., Quale, C., Austnes-Underhaug, R., Harstad, A. M., Fjose, S., Wifstad, K., Mellbye, C., Amble, I. B., Nyvold, C. E., Steffensen, T., Viggen, J. R., Inglebæk, F., Arnesen, T., & Hagen, S. E. 2015. A survey of employees in Norwegian petroleum-related businesses, with a particular focus on supplier firms' employees related to exports (in Norwegian), ordered by The Norwegian Oil and Gas Association, report IRIS 2015/031. URL: https://norceresearch.brage.unit.no/norceresearch-xmlui/handle/11250/2631778
Search via ReFindit
Christensen, L. R., & Jorgenson, D. W. 1969. The measurement of US real capital input, 1929–1967. Review of Income and Wealth, 15(4), 293-320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.1969.tb00814.x
Search via ReFindit
Davidian, M., & Giltinan, D. M. 2003. Nonlinear models for repeated measurement data: An overview and update. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 8(4), 387. https://doi.org/10.1198/1085711032697
Search via ReFindit
Davis, M. A., Fisher, J. D., & Whited, T. M. 2014. Macroeconomic implications of agglomeration. Econometrica, 82(2), 731-764. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA9029
Search via ReFindit
Dicken, P., & Lloyd, P. E. 1990. Location in space: Theoretical perspectives in economic geography. Prentice Hall. https://www.amazon.com/Location-Space-Theoretical-Perspectives-Geography/dp/0060416777
Search via ReFindit
Dijkstra, E. W. 1959. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematik, 1(1), 269-271. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01386390
Search via ReFindit
Donaldson, D., & Hornbeck, R. 2016. Railroads and American economic growth: A ‘market access' approach. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(2), 799-858. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw002
Search via ReFindit
Duranton, G., & Overman, H. G. 2005. Testing for localization using micro-geographic data. The Review of Economic Studies, 72(4), 1077-1106. https://doi.org/10.1111/0034-6527.00362
Search via ReFindit
Duranton, G., & Puga, D. 2004. Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 4, 2063-2117. 80005-1 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(04)
Search via ReFindit
Duranton, G., Morrow, P. M., & Turner, M. A. 2014. Roads and Trade: Evidence from the US. The Review of Economic Studies, 81(2), 681-724. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdt039
Search via ReFindit
El-Geneidy, A. M., & Levinson, D. M. 2006. Access to destinations: Development of accessibility measures. URL: https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/638
Search via ReFindit
Fujita M., Krugman P., & Venables, A. J. 1999. The spatial economy: Cities, regions and international trade, MIT Press, Cambridge MA. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6389.001.0001
Search via ReFindit
Fujita, M. 1988. A monopolistic competition model of spatial agglomeration: Differentiated product approach. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 18(1), 87-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(88)90007-5
Search via ReFindit
Gibbons, S., Lyytikäinen, T., Overman, H. G., & Sanchis-Guarner, R. 2019. New road infrastructure: The effects on firms. Journal of Urban Economics, 110, 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2019.01.002
Search via ReFindit
Graham, D. J. 2007. Agglomeration, productivity and transport investment. Journal of transport economics and policy, 41(3), 317-343. URL: https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/lse/jtep/2007/00000041/00000003/art00003
Search via ReFindit
Graham, D. J., & Gibbons, S. 2019. Quantifying Wider Economic Impacts of Agglomeration for Transport Appraisal: Existing Evidence and Future Directions. Economics of Transportation, 19, 100121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecotra.2019.100121
Search via ReFindit
Graham, D. J., Gibbons, S., & Martin, R. 2010. The spatial decay of agglomeration economies: Estimates for use in transport appraisal. Department for Transport. URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/44666
Search via ReFindit
Graham, D. J., Melo, P. S., Jiwattanakulpaisarn, P., & Noland, R. B. 2010. Testing for causality between productivity and agglomeration economies. Journal of Regional Science, 50(5), 935-951. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2010.00676.x
Search via ReFindit
Griliches, Z., & Jorgenson, D. W. 1966. Sources of measured productivity change: Capital input. The American Economic Review, 56(1/2), 50-61. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1821267
Search via ReFindit
Grünfeld, L. A., Holmen, R. B., Gulbrandsen, M. U., & Wifstad, K. 2013. Competitiveness and wage growth: Some updated indicators and perspectives (in Norwegian), topical comment, Samfunnsøkonomen No. 2014/9. URL: https://docplayer.me/462808-Samfunnsokonomen-nr-1-2014-128-argang-holden-grunfeld-mfl-bjerkholt-hauge-hawkins.html
Search via ReFindit
Handy, S. L., & Niemeier, D. A. 1997. Measuring accessibility: an exploration of issues and alternatives. Environment and planning A, 29(7), 1175-1194. https://doi.org/10.1068/a291175
Search via ReFindit
Hansen, W. G. 1959. How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25(2), 73-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944365908978307
Search via ReFindit
Hanson, G. H. (2005). Market potential, increasing returns and geographic concentration. Journal of International Economics, 67(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2004.09.008
Search via ReFindit
Harris, C. D. 1954. The Market as a Factor in the Localization of Industry in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 44(4), 315-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045605409352140
Search via ReFindit
Holmen, R. B. (2022b). Productivity impulses from regional integration: lessons from road openings. Insights into Regional Development, 4(4), 83–125. https://doi.org/10.9770/ird.2022.4.4(6)
Search via ReFindit
Holmen, R. B. & Hansen, W. 2020. The Scientific Foundation for Impacts Estimation in Transportation Appraisal: A Literature Review. Chapter 2 in Productivity and Mobility in Holmen, R. B. (2020). A dissertation submitted to BI Norwegian Business School for the degree of PhD. PhD specialization: Economics. Series of Dissertations 7/2020. Contact information for access: rbh@toi.no
Search via ReFindit
Holmen, R. B. 2020. Heterogeneity in Fixed Capital Estimation: Implications for Productivity Estimation. Chapter 4 in Productivity and Mobility in Holmen, R. B. (2020). A dissertation submitted to BI Norwegian Business School for the degree of PhD. PhD specialization: Economics. Series of Dissertations 7/2020. Contact information for access: rbh@toi.no
Search via ReFindit
Holmen, R. B. 2022a. Fixed Capital Estimation: Utilization of Macro Data to Account for Capital Heterogeneity at Firm Level. Beta Scandinavian Journal of Business Research. Forthcoming. URL: https://www.idunn.no/journal/beta
Search via ReFindit
Jorgenson, D. W., & Griliches, Z. 1967. The explanation of productivity change. The Review of Economic Studies, 34(3), 249-283. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296675
Search via ReFindit
Marshall, A. 1890. Principles of economics, revised 1920. London: Mac-Millan. https://www.amazon.com/Principles-Economics-Great-Alfred-Marshall/dp/1573921408
Search via ReFindit
McCann, P. 2005. Transport costs and new economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 5(3), 305-318. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlecg/lbh050
Search via ReFindit
Melitz, M. J., & Ottaviano, G. I. 2008. Market size, trade, and productivity. The Review of Economic Studies, 75(1), 295-316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2008.00505.x
Search via ReFindit
Melo, P. C., Graham, D. J., & Brage-Ardao, R. 2013. The productivity of transport infrastructure investment: A meta-analysis of empirical evidence. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 43(5), 695-706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2013.05.002
Search via ReFindit
Melo, P. C., Graham, D. J., & Noland, R. B. 2009. A meta-analysis of estimates of urban agglomeration economies. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39(3), 332-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.12.002
Search via ReFindit
Redding, S. J. 2010. The empirics of new economic geography. Journal of Regional Science, 50(1), 297-311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00646.x
Search via ReFindit
Redding, S. J., & Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2017). Quantitative spatial economics. Annual Review of Economics, 9, 21-58. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-063016-103713
Search via ReFindit
Redding, S., & Venables, A. (2004). Geography and export performance: external market access and internal supply capacity. In Challenges to globalization: Analyzing the economics (pp. 95-130). University of Chicago Press. URL: https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c9535/c9535.pdf
Search via ReFindit
Rice, P., Venables, A. J., & Patacchini, E. 2006. Spatial determinants of productivity: analysis for the regions of Great Britain. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36(6), 727-752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2006.03.006
Search via ReFindit
Rigby, D. L., & Brown, W. M. (2015). Who benefits from agglomeration?. Regional Studies, 49(1), 28-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.753141
Search via ReFindit
Rosenthal, S. S., & Strange, W. C. 2003. Geography, industrial organization, and agglomeration. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(2), 377-393. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465303765299882
Search via ReFindit
Rosenthal, S. S., & Strange, W. C. 2004. Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 4, 2119-2171. 80006-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(04)
Search via ReFindit
Sevtsuk, A., & Mekonnen, M. 2012. Urban network analysis. Revue internationale de géomatique–n, p. 287-305. https://doi.org/10.3166/rig.22.287-305
Search via ReFindit
Shirley, C., & Winston, C. 2004. Firm inventory behavior and the returns from highway infrastructure investments. Journal of Urban Economics, 55(2), 398-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2003.11.001
Search via ReFindit
Venables, A. J. 2007. Evaluating Urban Transport Improvements: Cost-Benefit Analysis in the Presence of Agglomeration and Income Taxation. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 41, 173-188. URL: https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/lse/jtep/2007/00000041/00000002/art00002
Search via ReFindit
Vickerman, R., Spiekermann, K., & Wegener, M. 1999. Accessibility and economic development in Europe. Regional Studies, 33(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409950118878
Search via ReFindit
Waddell, P., & Ulfarsson, G. F. (2003). Accessibility and agglomeration: Discrete-choice models of employment location by industry sector. In 82nd annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC (Vol. 63) URL: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.202.5658&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Search via ReFindit
RSS 1.0