ESC

Clarivate

JCR Category: Business in ESCI edition

Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues Open access
Journal Impact FactorTM (2025) 1.5 Q3
Journal Citation IndicatorTM (2025) 0.25 Q4
Received: 2026-05-11  |  Accepted: 2026-07-28  |  Published: 2026-09-30

Title

Global regulatory models towards an inclusive economy: three facets of emerging digital feudalism


Abstract

In an era of rapid financial digitalization, the pursuit of an inclusive economy - understood primarily as expanded access to payments, savings, credit, and investment for the unbanked and underserved populations - has become a central policy objective worldwide. Yet this transformation reveals a profound paradox: technologies such as distributed ledger technology (DLT), tokenization, central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), and stablecoins promise democratization of finance, while simultaneously enabling new forms of concentrated power and control. Approximately 1.3–1.4 billion adults globally remain unbanked, despite notable progress in digital financial services. This article examines three distinct regulatory models shaping the digital financial landscape: the European (bureaucratic oversight via MiCA and related acts), the American (private-sector-led innovation with restrictions on retail CBDCs), and the Sino-Indian (state-controlled digital infrastructure). Drawing on neo-institutional theory, we argue that these models, while advancing inclusion, risk fostering variants of emerging digital feudalism - characterized by new hierarchies of "cloud lords," platform dependencies, and diminished individual economic autonomy. Updating our prior work (Baltgailis & Menshikov, 2025), we incorporate fresh evidence from 2025–2026 developments, including Project mBridge reaching MVP stage, the U.S. temporary CBDC ban, explosive growth of China’s e-CNY, and the implementation effects of Europe’s MiCA framework. We identify institutional parameters that determine outcomes in this "game" of digital finance and propose safeguards to balance innovation, inclusion, and freedom. In the age of tokenization and DLT, money ceases to be a neutral medium of exchange and increasingly becomes an instrument of power.


Keywords

distributed ledger technology, central bank digital currency, stablecoins, digital feudalism, financial inclusion, neo-institutional theory, multinational corporations


JEL classifications

L26 , J24 , M13 , I21


URI

http://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/6689


DOI


Pages

394-407


Funding

This research was funded by Daugavpils University, Latvia.

This is an open access issue and all published articles are licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Authors

Menshikov, Vladimir
Daugavpils University, Daugavpils, Latvia https://du.lv
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Baltgailis, Jurijs
Daugavpils University, Daugavpils, Latvia https://du.lv
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Ruža, Oksana
Daugavpils University, Daugavpils, Latvia https://du.lv
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Journal title

Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues

Volume

14


Number

1


Issue date

September 2026


Issue DOI


ISSN

ISSN 2345-0282 (online)


Publisher

VšĮ Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, Vilnius, Lithuania

Cited

Google Scholar

Article views & downloads

HTML views: 362  |  PDF downloads: 270

References


Altavilla, C., Boucinha M., Burlon L., Adalid, R., Fortes, R., & Maruhn, F. (2026). Stablecoins and monetary policy transmission. — Frankfurt am Main: European Central Bank. Working Paper Series, No. 3199 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6340362

Search via ReFindit


Baltgailis, J., & Menshikov, V. (2025). The development of an inclusive economy could give impetus to the formation of digital neo-feudalism. Baltic Journal of Legal and Social Sciences, 2025(1), Special issue https://doi.org/10.30525/2592-8813-2025-spec-7

Search via ReFindit


Bank for International Settlements. (2023). Annual Economic Report 2023 https://www.bis.org/publ/arpdf/ar2023e3.pdf

Search via ReFindit


Bank for International Settlements. (2024). Project mBridge reaches minimum viable product stage https://www.bis.org/about/bisih/topics/cbdc/mcbdc_bridge.htm

Search via ReFindit


Chabosseau, T., & Dobeson, A. (2025). Platform failures: How conflicting data conceptions undermine digital collaboration. Competition & Change. Advance online publication https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294251366588

Search via ReFindit


Chhangani, A. (2026) (2026). What to watch as China prepares its digital yuan for prime time. Atlantic Council https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/econographics/what-to-watch-as-china-prepares-its-digital-yuan-for-prime-time/

Search via ReFindit


Cipollone, P. (2025). The transformation of money: Technological disruption and the future of financial services. European Central Bank https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2025/html/ecb.sp251208~4c07c78304.en.html

Search via ReFindit


Cone, L. (2024). Subscribing school: Digital platforms, affective attachments, and cruel optimism in a Danish public primary school. Critical Studies in Education https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2023.2269425

Search via ReFindit


European Central Bank. (2024). The Eurosystem’s exploratory work on new technologies for wholesale central bank money settlement https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/pubbydate/2025/html/ecb.exploratoryworknewtechnologies202506.en.html

Search via ReFindit


European Central Bank. (2025). Stablecoins and monetary policy transmission (Working Paper Series No. 3199) https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecb/ecbwps/20263199.html

Search via ReFindit


European Parliament and Council of the European Union. (2022). Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market for Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act). Official Journal of the European Union, L 277, 1-102 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj

Search via ReFindit


Funding: This research was funded by Daugavpils University, Latvia. /jesi/article/6689

Search via ReFindit


Gilbert, J. (2026). Techno-feudalism or platform capitalism? Conceptualising the digital society. European Journal of Social Theory, 27(4), 561-578 https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310241276474

Search via ReFindit


Goodell Ugalde, E. (2026). Beyond techno-feudalism: A monopoly-capital analysis of artificial intelligence investment. Capital & Class. Advance online publication https://doi.org/10.1177/03098168261448192

Search via ReFindit


Hegel, G. (2015). The science of logic (G. Di Giovanni, Trans.; New ed.). Cambridge University Press https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316162570

Search via ReFindit


International Monetary Fund https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400253331.063

Search via ReFindit


Lannquist, A., & Tan, B. (2023). International Monetary Fund. Central bank digital currency’s role in promoting financial inclusion. /jesi/article/6689

Search via ReFindit


Menshikov V., Ruza O., Baltgailis J. (2025). The digital transformation and the inclusive economy: navigating the risks. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 13(2), 299-312 https://doi.org/10.9770/s4626758963

Search via ReFindit


Mises, L. (1949). Human Action. A Treatise on Economics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. /jesi/article/6689

Search via ReFindit


North, D. C. (1990).  Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511808678

Search via ReFindit


Olson, M. (1982). The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation and Social Rigidities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. /jesi/article/6689

Search via ReFindit


Sadowski, J. (2020). The internet of landlords: Digital platforms and new mechanisms of rentier capitalism. Antipode, 52(2), 562-580 https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12595

Search via ReFindit


Samu, A. (2026). US Senate passes housing bill with CBDC ban until 2030. Disruption Banking https://www.disruptionbanking.com/2026/03/15/us-senate-passes-housing-bill-with-cbdc-ban-until-2030/

Search via ReFindit


Seibt, B. (2026). Beyond commodification: A taxonomy of relational model degradation and the limits of the UDHR framework. Theory and Society, 55(3), 46 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-026-09713-y

Search via ReFindit


Shams, S. (2026). Living in techno/digital/neo-feudalist times. International Sociology, 41(2), 183-190 https://doi.org/10.1177/02685809261436859

Search via ReFindit


Varoufakis, Y. (2023). Technofeudalism: What Killed Capitalism. — London: The Bodley Head, 281 p. /jesi/article/6689

Search via ReFindit


World Bank Group. (2025). Financial inclusion overview https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/financial-sector/financial-inclusion

Search via ReFindit


World Economic Forum. (2026). How stablecoins can expand financial access to the most underserved and unbanked https://www.weforum.org/stories/2026/01/how-stablecoins-can-expand-financial-access/

Search via ReFindit


Yan, J. (2026). Techno-feudalism as primitive accumulation: A Marxist perspective on digital capitalism. Critical Sociology, 52(1), 203-217 https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205241302838

Search via ReFindit


Yang, J., Guo, J., & Gong, L. (2026). Against techno-feudalism in academia: Reclaiming scholarly autonomy in the age of AI. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 19, 249-254 https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2026.3673243

Search via ReFindit