ESC

Clarivate

JCR Category: Business in ESCI edition

Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues Open access
Journal Impact FactorTM (2025) 1.5 Q3
Journal Citation IndicatorTM (2025) 0.25 Q4
Received: 2026-03-10  |  Accepted: 2026-06-13  |  Published: 2026-09-30

Title

Political fragmentation and public debt development in European Union countries


Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between the ideological fragmentation of government coalitions and the development of public debt in European Union countries. The study examines whether political polarisation and the ideological range of governing coalitions influence both short-term public debt dynamics and the long-term level of public debt. The empirical analysis is based on panel data from 16 EU member states covering the period 2002–2022 and uses two-way fixed-effects panel regression models with country- and year-fixed effects. Two dimensions of political fragmentation are analysed: government political polarisation (cab_wpolar) and the ideological range of coalition parties (cab_prefrange). The results indicate that political variables are not systematically associated with year-on-year changes in public debt. In contrast, several model specifications suggest that political polarisation may contribute to higher long-term public debt levels, while broader ideological coalitions may under certain conditions be associated with lower public debt. The findings suggest that political fragmentation primarily influences public finances through gradual long-term fiscal mechanisms rather than through immediate annual debt fluctuations.


Keywords

political polarization, ideological range, public debt, European Union


JEL classifications

H63 , E62 , D72


URI

http://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/6668


DOI


Pages

23-35


Funding

This research was funded by the project VEGA No. 1/0329/26 Efficiency and Sustainability of Welfare Regimes in the Context of Population Ageing in European Union Countries, While Maintaining Intergenerational Balance.

This is an open access issue and all published articles are licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Authors

Tkacova, Andrea
Technical University of Košice, Košice, Slovakia http://www.tuke.sk
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Spišáková, Emília Duľová
Technical University of Košice, Košice, Slovakia http://www.tuke.sk
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Journal title

Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues

Volume

14


Number

1


Issue date

September 2026


Issue DOI


ISSN

ISSN 2345-0282 (online)


Publisher

VšĮ Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, Vilnius, Lithuania

Cited

Google Scholar

Article views & downloads

HTML views: 256  |  PDF downloads: 195

References


Alesina, A., & Drazen, A. (1991). Why are stabilisations delayed? American Economic Review, 81(5), 1170-1188 http://www.jstor.org/stable/2006912

Search via ReFindit


Alesina, A., & Perotti, R. (1995). The Political Economy of Budget Deficits. Staff Papers, 42(1), 1-31 https://doi.org/10.2307/3867338

Search via ReFindit


Alesina, A., & Tabellini, G. (1990). A positive theory of fiscal deficits and government debt. The Review of Economic Studies, 57(3), 403-414 https://doi.org/10.2307/2298021

Search via ReFindit


Bonet-Morón, J., Ayala-García, J., & Guerra-España, J. (2024). Staying in Power: How Does Political Continuity Shape Debt? Banco de la República de Colombia https://doi.org/10.32468/dtseru.331

Search via ReFindit


Brożek, K., Poteralska, B., & Łabędzka, J. (2022). Public debt marriage with R&D management in the V4 and EU-27 countries in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Central European Review of Economics & Finance, 37(2), 5-22.  http://doi.org/10.24136/ceref.2022.006

Search via ReFindit


Calderón, C., Duncan, R., & Schmidt‐Hebbel, K. (2012). Do Good Institutions Promote Counter-Cyclical Macroeconomic Policies? Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 78(5), 650-670 https://doi.org/10.24149/gwp118

Search via ReFindit


Carnazza, G., Liberati, P., & Sacchi, A. (2025). Does politics matter? A comparative assessment of discretionary fiscal policies in the euro area. European Journal of Political Economy, 90, Early Access  http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2023.102435

Search via ReFindit


Dziuda, W., & Loeper, A. (2016). Dynamic collective choice with endogenous status quo. Journal of Political Economy, 124, 1148-1186 https://doi.org/10.1086/686747

Search via ReFindit


Economides, G., Papageorgiou, D., & Philippopoulos, A. (2021). Austerity, Assistance and Institutions: Lessons from the Greek Sovereign Debt Crisis. Open Economies Review, 32(3), 435-478 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-020-09613-3

Search via ReFindit


Fedeli, S., & Forte, F. (2003). The impact of the electoral system and of other political institutions on public debt and government’s finances in Italy. In: Economic welfare, international business and global institutional change. Edward Elgar Publishing, 36-80 https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781950814.00010

Search via ReFindit


Franchino, F. (2024). International oversight of fiscal discipline. European Journal of Political Research, 63(1), 281-302 https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12600

Search via ReFindit


Funding: This research was funded by the project VEGA No. 1/0329/26 Efficiency and Sustainability of Welfare Regimes in the Context of Population Ageing in European Union Countries, While Maintaining Intergenerational Balance. /jesi/article/6668

Search via ReFindit


Grechyna, D. (2016). Political frictions and public policy outcomes. Journal of Comparative Economics, 44(3), 484-495 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2016.06.001

Search via ReFindit


Greiner, A. (2007). An Endogenous Growth Model with Public Capital and Sustainable Government Debt. Japanese Economic Review, 58(3), 345-361 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5876.2007.00394.x

Search via ReFindit


Hellström, J. (2025). Update Released: New countries added to the basic data (March 2025). REPDEM - The Representative Democracy Data Archive. [online] Available at: https://repdem.org/index.php/2025/03/18/update-released-new-countries-added-to-the-basic-data-march-2025/

Search via ReFindit


Jolly, S., Bakker, R., Hooghe, L., Marks, G., Polk, J., Rovny, J., Steenbergen, M., & Vachudova, M.A. (2022). Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File, 1999-2019. Electoral Studies, 75, p.102420 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102420

Search via ReFindit


Kraemer, R., & Lehtimaki, J. (2024). Government debt, European Institutions and fiscal rules: a synthetic control approach. International Tax and Public Finance, 31(4), 1112-1157.  http://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-023-09791-z

Search via ReFindit


Lee, I. (2022). Does Political Polarisation Lead to a Rise in Government Debt? Hacienda Pública Española, (241), 3-25. https:// doi.org/10.7866/HPE-RPE.22.2.1 /jesi/article/6668

Search via ReFindit


Lehmann, P., Franzmann, S., Al-Gaddooa, D., Burst, T., Ivanusch, C., Regel, S., Riethmüller, F., Volkens, A., Weßels, B., & Zehnter, L. (2025). The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project. Version 2025a. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB) https://doi.org/10.25522/manifesto.mpds.2025a

Search via ReFindit


Locatelli, C. (2026). Mind the output gap: the (de-) politicisation of fiscal policy in the EU. Journal of European Integration, Early Access  http://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2026.2649954

Search via ReFindit


Malik, C., Tamat, S., Norlin, K., & Law, S. (2022). Too Much Debt and Budget Deficit on Fiscal Sustainability: Do Institutions Matter? Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies, 59(2), 261-284 https://doi.org/10.22452/mjes.vol59no2.5

Search via ReFindit


Melki, M., & Pickering, A. (2021). Ideological polarisation and government debt. International Tax and Public Finance, 29(4), 811-833 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-021-09690-1

Search via ReFindit


Olivella, J. M. M. (2020). Fiscal responsiveness to public debt: An analysis of regional debt limit uncertainty in Spain. Hacienda Pública Española/Review of Public Economics, 233(2). 55-83 https://doi.org/10.7866/HPE-RPE.20.2.3

Search via ReFindit


Persson, T., & Svensson, L.E. (1989). Why a stubborn conservative would run a deficit: Policy with time-inconsistent preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104(2), 325-345 https://doi.org/10.2307/2937850

Search via ReFindit


Piguillem, F., & Riboni, A. (2015). Spending-biased legislators: discipline through disagreement. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130, 901-949 https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjv011

Search via ReFindit


Rajaguru, G., Khan, S., & Rahman, H. (2021). Analysis of Australia’s Fiscal Vulnerability to Crisis. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(7), p.297 https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14070297

Search via ReFindit


Roubini, N., & Sachs, J. (1989). Political and economic determinants of budget deficits in the industrial democracies. European Economic Review, 33(5), 903-933 https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(89)90002-0

Search via ReFindit


Smith, H.J.M., & Melguizo, I. (2018). Over-Indebted Subnational Mexico: Does Political Polarisation Affect Debt Policy Decisions? SSRN Electronic Journal https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2518623

Search via ReFindit


Strachinaru, A. V. (2024). Analysis of Public Debt in the Context of Crises Generated by Socio-Economic Events. Case Study: European Union Countries, Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 71(4), 547-582.  http://doi.org/10.47743/saeb-2024-0026

Search via ReFindit


Vicente, F. L., Vives, M. R., Rojas, J. (2024). Public spending on defence, public order and safety in Spain and the European Union. Economic Bulletin, 20 http://doi.org/10.53479/37495

Search via ReFindit


Vuković, M. (2017). Economic, political and institutional determinants of fiscal deficit. Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta Novi Sad, 51(2), 417-432 https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns51-13798

Search via ReFindit