Received:
2026-02-22 | Accepted:
2026-04-25 | Published:
2026-06-30
Title
Management opportunities for the well-being of generation Z students in higher education: the case of Lithuania
Abstract
In the context of scientific literature, this article presents an assessment of the factors determining the well-being of Generation Z students in higher education and discusses the possibilities for managing student well-being. The authors understand the management of Generation Z students’ well-being in higher education as a unified process of planning, organising, implementing, and controlling, based on institutional coordination, participatory decision-making, and cooperation between the higher education institution and students. Such an approach creates preconditions for systematically reducing psychosocial risks and increasing students’ engagement in the study process, considering the views of Generation Z learners. Research aim: to investigate the factors determining the well-being of Generation Z students in higher education and to identify the possibilities for its management. Analytical descriptive, quantitative, and statistical methods were applied. Using a quantitative research strategy, the attitudes of respondents (n=290) towards the factors determining Generation Z students’ well-being in higher education were identified, and, based on participants’ assessments, possibilities for managing the well-being of Generation Z students in the study process were outlined. The results showed that although more than two-thirds (74.1%) of respondents rated their well-being at their higher education institution as relatively high (scores 6–8) or very high (scores 9–10), one-quarter (25.9%) indicated feeling unwell, rating their well-being between 1 and 5 on a 10-point scale. Data analysis revealed that the organisation of the study process – clear and accessible study information provided through various channels, appropriate study pace and workload (alignment of tasks and time), and study content (lecture topics, materials, methods, etc.) – as well as good, collaborative relationships between teachers and students, are among the key factors determining the well-being of Generation Z students in higher education. The research found that diverse communication forms with teachers, attractive study methods, flexible opportunities to combine studies with work, and a modern, innovative study environment may be effective ways to enhance Generation Z students’ well-being in higher education. Furthermore, clearly presented study process information, comprehensible teaching materials and assessment requirements, as well as clear and flexible assessment organisation (including timing and volume) and appropriate distribution of study workload, were evaluated by participants as essential measures for ensuring the well-being of Generation Z students. The study results provide valuable insights into the factors influencing the well-being of Generation Z students within the study process at the organisational level of higher education institutions. They also offer lasting value for academic discourse by outlining potential directions for managing the well-being of Generation Z students in higher education.
Keywords
generation Z, students, well-being, higher education, management, opportunities
JEL classifications
A20
, E02
URI
http://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/6657
DOI
Pages
320-337
Funding
This research was funded by Vilniaus kolegija/Higher Education Institution, Applied Sciences, Lithuania
This is an open access issue and all published articles are licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
Behr A., Giese M., Kamdjou H. D. T., & Theune K. (2020). Motives for dropping out from higher education –An analysis of bachelor’s degree students in Germany. European Journal of Education, 56(2), 325-343 https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12433
Search via ReFindit
Bumbacco, C., & Scharfe, E. (2020). Why Attachment Matters: First-Year Post-secondary Students' Experience of Burnout, Disengagement, and Dropout. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 0(0), 1-14 https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1360363
Search via ReFindit
Casanova, J. R., Cervero, A., Núñez, J. C., Almeida, L. S., & Bernardo, A. (2018). Factors that determine the persistence and dropout of university students. University of Minho and University of Oviedo. Psicothema, 30(4), 408-414 https://orcid.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.155
Search via ReFindit
Černikovaitė, M. E. (2021). Studentų įsitraukimo veiksniai į nuotolines studijas COVID-19 pandemijos metu. In COVID-19 poveikis studentų akademiniam ir socialiniam gyvenimui: elektroninis konferencijos pranešimų rinkinys, 39-43 https://cris.mruni.eu/server/api/core/bitstreams/00bf1f94-0a50-41c8-8147-e54164638ebb/content
Search via ReFindit
Fourie, C. M. (2017). The Role of Academic and Non-Academic Factors on the Development of a Sense of Belonging among First-Year Students. In Collaboration, Communities and Competition: International Perspectives from the Academy (edited by S. Dent, L. Lane, and T. Strike), 143-167 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-122-3_9
Search via ReFindit
Fourie, C. M. (2020). Risk factors associated with first-year students’intention to dropout from a university in South Africa. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(2), 201-215 https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1527023
Search via ReFindit
Hauschildt, K., Gwosć, Ch., Schirmer, H., Mandl, S., & Cordelia, M. (2024). Social and economic conditions of student life in Europe: EUROSTUDENT 8 Synopsis of Indicators 2021-2024 https://doi.org/10.25656/01:31932
Search via ReFindit
Kallunki, J., Viseu, S., & Silvén, P. (2025). Network governance in Finnish higher education and science policy, 2012–2021. Higher Education https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-025-01557-2
Search via ReFindit
Kazlauskienė, R., Jakubkytė, A., & Ruzgailaitė, L. (2024). Studijų patrauklumą lemiantys veiksniai ir jo didinimo galimybės. Science & Processes of Education/Mokslas ir edukaciniai procesai, 1(38), 5-21. Šiauliai, ISSN 2345-068.1 https://vb.vtdko.lt/object/elaba:206380260/
Search via ReFindit
Kehm, B. M., Larsen, M. R., & Sommersel, H. B. (2019). Student dropout from universities in Europe: A review of empirical literature. Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 9(2), 147-164 https://doi.org/10.1556/063.9.2019.1.18
Search via ReFindit
Khatri, P., Duggal, H. K., Lim, W. M., Thomas, A., & Shiva, A. (2024). Student well-being in higher education: Scale development and validation with implications for management education. The International Journal of Management Education, 22(1), 100933 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.100933
Search via ReFindit
Konstantinidis, A. (2024). An integrative review of the literature on factors influencing student well-being in the learning environment. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 7, 100384 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100384
Search via ReFindit
Kümmel, E., Moskaliuk, J., Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2020). Digital learning environments in higher education: A literature review of the role of individual vs. social settings for measuring learning outcomes. Education Sciences, 10(3), 78 https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10030078
Search via ReFindit
Larmuseau, C., Desmet, P., & Depaepe, F. (2019). Perceptions of instructional quality: Impact on acceptance and use of an online learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 27, 953-964 https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1509874
Search via ReFindit
Lehnchen, J., Helmer, S. M., Heinrichs, K., Burian, J., Deptolla, Z., Heumann, E., & Stock, C. (2025). Assessment of study conditions, needs for action and students’ mental health in Germany – results from the cross-sectional StudiBiFra study. Journal of Public Health https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-024-02387-9
Search via ReFindit
Mostert, K., & Pienaar, J. (2020). The moderating effect of social support on the relationship between burnout, intention to drop out, and satisfaction with studies of first-year university students. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 30(3), 197-202 https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2020.1767928
Search via ReFindit
Mouton, D., Zhang, H., & Ertl, B. (2020). German university student's reasons for dropout. Identifying latent classes. Journal for Educational Research Online, 12(2), 190-224 https://doi.org/10.25656/01:20977
Search via ReFindit
Muja, A., Menz, C., Danaii, D., Hauschildt, K., van Mensvoort, C., & Cuppen, J. (2024). Student well‑being: The role of socio‑demographic background, contextual conditions, and study demands and resources on the well‑being of students in the European Higher Education Area (EUROSTUDENT thematic report). EUROSTUDENT https://www.eurostudent.eu/download_files/documents/EUROSTUDENT_2024_student_well_being.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Search via ReFindit
Olsson, T. M., Broberg, M., Frisk, S., Wackenhut, A. F., Kjellin, D., Gullstrand, S., Rost, S., & Skoog, T. (2024). Health‑promoting learning environments in higher education: A scoping review of structural interventions to protect student mental health. European Journal of Education, 59(4) https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12772
Search via ReFindit
Paiva, U., Cortese, S., Flor, M., Moncada‑Parra, A., Lecumberri, A., Eudave, L., Magallón, S., García‑González, S., Sobrino‑Morras, Á., Piqué, I., Mestre‑Bach, G., Solmi, M., Arrondo, G. (2025). Prevalence of mental disorder symptoms among university students: An umbrella review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 175, 106244 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106244
Search via ReFindit
Pakalniškienė, V. (2012). Tyrimo ir įvertinimo priemonių patikimumo ir validumo nustatymas. Metodinė priemonė (Determining the reliability and validity of research and evaluation tools. Methodological tool). Vilnius: Vilniaus Universiteto leidykla https://www.vu.lt/leidyba/images/knygos/Filosofija/Tyrimo_ir_%C4%AFvertinimo_priemoni%C5%B3_patikimumo_ir_validumo_nustatymas.pdf
Search via ReFindit
Pečiuliauskienė, P., Valantinaitė, I., & Malonaitienė, V. (2013). Z karta: kūrybingumas ir integracija. Vilnius: Edukologija https://www.lituanistika.lt/content/82779
Search via ReFindit
Rossato, L., Veloso Morotti, C. A., & Scorsolini-Comin, F. (2024) Transition and Adaptation to Higher Education in Brazilian First-Year Nursing Students. Journal of Latinos and Education, 23(1), 2-12 https://doi.org/10.1080/15348431.2022.2102499
Search via ReFindit
Samašonok K., Kamienas E., & Juškevičienė A. (2023). Factors determining dropouts from higher education institutions. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 10(3), 151-169 https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2023.10.3(11
Search via ReFindit
Samašonok, K. (2024). Z kartos studentų mokymosi motyvacijos aukštojoje mokykloje valdymo galimybės. Possibilities of ensuring the learning motivation of generation z students in higher education. Science & Processes of Education / Mokslas ir edukaciniai procesai, 1(38), p. 5-22. Šiauliai, ISSN 2345-0681 https://www.salumeda.lt/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/MEPDec_2024.pdf
Search via ReFindit
Šćukanec Schmidt, N., Skledar Matijević, A., & Anić, Z. (2023). Linking quality assurance and the social dimension of higher education, NESET report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union https://en.iro.hr/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/linking-quality-assurance-and-the-social-dimension-NC0722853ENN.pdf
Search via ReFindit
Skaniakos, T., Penttinen, L., & Lairio, M. (2014). Peer group mentoring programmes in Finnish higher education – mentors’ perspectives. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 22(1), 74-86 https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2014.882609
Search via ReFindit
Swindell, N., Thomas, J., Tree, J., Hill, D., Hudson, J., & Stratton, G. (2023). Understanding (in)formal health and wellbeing networks within higher education: A mixed method social network perspective. Higher Education, 88, 1037-1058 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01158-x
Search via ReFindit
Tett, L., Riddell, S., Christie, H., King, R., & Shan, S. (2025). University students’ sense of belonging and the impact of commuting. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 1-21. Advance online publication https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2025.2522547
Search via ReFindit
Urbonienė, J., Bartuševičienė V., & Puidokaitė-Savickienė R. (2019). Studijuojančiųjų poreikiai e. studijoms Lietuvos aukštosiose mokyklose. Įžvalgos, 2, 71-86 https://www.lituanistika.lt/content/99306
Search via ReFindit
Valtonen, T., Leppänen, U., Hyypiä, M., Kokko, A. K., Manninen, J., Vartiainen, H., Sointu, E., & Hirsto, L. (2021). Learning environments preferred by university students: A shift toward informal and flexible learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 24(3), 371-388 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09339-6
Search via ReFindit
Wu, X. I., Occhipinti, S., & Watson, B. (2023). Mainland Chinese students’ psychological adaptation to Hong Kong: an intergroup communication perspective. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 46(8), 2342-2357 https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2023.2287045
Search via ReFindit
Yu, B., & Downing, K. (2012) Determinants of international students’ adaptation: examining effects of integrative motivation, instrumental motivation and second language proficiency. Educational Studies, 38(4), 457-471 https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2011.643111
Search via ReFindit
RSS 1.0