ESC

Clarivate

JCR Category: Business in ESCI edition

Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues Open access
Journal Impact FactorTM (2025) 1.5 Q3
Journal Citation IndicatorTM (2025) 0.25 Q4
Received: 2026-01-25  |  Accepted: 2026-03-30  |  Published: 2026-06-30

Title

Left, right, or buy green? Political ideology and sustainable consumption in Europe


Abstract

This research investigates the role of ideological self-placement in explaining Europe’s sustainable consumption orientations based on two high-quality secondary datasets, namely, World Values Survey (WVS) Wave 7 and Special Eurobarometer 513/Eurobarometer 95.1. This analysis builds on confirmatory factor analysis and multilevel modeling to distinguish between moral willingness to bear private environmental costs and reported climate-relevant consumer practices. Within the WVS, we formulate a latent orientation founded on the environment–growth trade-off, as well as readiness to incur higher taxes or sacrifice income for pollution abatement; within Eurobarometer, we summarise climate-relevant household and purchase behaviours through a Green Consumer Action Index. The results show a steady ideological gradient: respondents placing further to the right report declining willingness to incur private economic costs to help the environment. The relationship remains significant after controlling for socio-economic status and religiosity, and is partially attenuated with the control for environmental concern. Evidence from Eurobarometer corroborates this pattern by illustrating substantial uptake of cheap, low-effort actions such as recycling and reducing disposables, but much weaker uptake of expensive actions like solar panels, low-energy homes and electric cars. Cross-dataset triangulation thus indicates that ideology influences moral preference whereas institutions, infrastructure, and affordability constrain behavioral feasibility. The results highlight the importance of fair, cost-reducing climate policies that can transform willingness to act in favour of the environment into durable consumer behaviours.


Keywords

sustainable consumption, political ideology, WVS, Eurobarometer, environmental concern, multilevel modeling, political consumerism


JEL classifications

Q50 , Q56 , D12 , D72


URI

http://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/6653


DOI


Pages

265-278


Funding


This is an open access issue and all published articles are licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Authors

Žemaitis, Eigirdas
ISM University of Management and Economics, Vilnius, Lithuania https://www.ism.lt
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Uygur, Mehmet Recai
Vilnius Business College, Vilnius, Lithuania https://www.kolegija.lt
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Toye, Samson Abiodun
Vilnius Business College, Vilnius, Lithuania https://www.kolegija.lt
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Šimelytė, Agnė
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VILNIUS TECH), Vilnius, Lithuania https://vilniustech.lt
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Journal title

Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues

Volume

13


Number

4


Issue date

June 2026


Issue DOI


ISSN

ISSN 2345-0282 (online)


Publisher

VšĮ Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, Vilnius, Lithuania

Cited

Google Scholar

Article views & downloads

HTML views: 539  |  PDF downloads: 453

References


Andrade, E. B., & Vieites, Y. (2025). Obstacles and opportunities for sustainable consumption: A comprehensive conceptual model, literature review, and research agenda. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 35(4), 637-662 https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.70003

Search via ReFindit


Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Multiple-group factor analysis alignment. Structural Equation Modeling, 21(4), 495-508 https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.919210

Search via ReFindit


Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14-25 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002

Search via ReFindit


Bouman, T., Steg, L., & Dietz, T. (2024). The public demands more climate action, not less: Rising political climate opposition does not reflect public opinion. Climatic Change, 177, Article 167 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-024-03832-0

Search via ReFindit


Copeland, L., & Boulianne, S. (2022). Political consumerism: A meta-analysis. International Political Science Review, 43(1), 3-18 https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120905048

Search via ReFindit


Davidov, E., Meuleman, B., Cieciuch, J., Schmidt, P., & Billiet, J. (2014). Measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 55-75 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043137

Search via ReFindit


Davidović, D., Harring, N., & Jagers, S. C. (2020). The contingent effects of environmental concern and ideology: Institutional context and people’s willingness to pay environmental taxes. Climate Policy, 20(5), 593-611 https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1606882

Search via ReFindit


Ebbinghaus, L., Georgi, D., Zbinden, M., & Dahinden, L. (2025). Development and validation of the environmentally sustainable consumer behavior index (ESCBI): A composite tool to measure and advance private-sphere pro-environmental consumer behaviors. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 19, 100365 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2025.100365

Search via ReFindit


Elmor, L., Ramos, G. A., Vieites, Y., Andretti, B., & Andrade, E. B. (2025). Environmental sustainability considerations (or lack thereof) in consumer decision making. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 42(4), 1203-1228 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.08.003

Search via ReFindit


Eom, K., Kim, H. S., Sherman, D. K., & Ishii, K. (2016). Cultural variability in the link between environmental concern and support for environmental action. Psychological Science, 27(10), 1331-1339 https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616660078

Search via ReFindit


European Commission. (2019). Communication on the European Green Deal (COM(2019) 640 final) https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52019DC0640

Search via ReFindit


European Commission. (2021a). Special Eurobarometer 513: Climate change (Eurobarometer 95.1). Directorate-General for Climate Action https://doi.org/10.2834/437

Search via ReFindit


European Commission. (2021b). Special Eurobarometer 513: Climate change (Eurobarometer 95.1) [Data set]. GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14079

Search via ReFindit


European Commission. (2025). Climate change – June 2025. Eurobarometer survey https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/3472

Search via ReFindit


European Values Study (EVS) & World Values Survey (WVS). (2021). Common EVS/WVS dictionary: Integrated variable correspondences, 1981–2022. GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences https://access.gesis.org

Search via ReFindit


Fairbrother, M., Johansson Sevä, I., & Kulin, J. (2019). Political trust and the relationship between climate change beliefs and support for fossil fuel taxes: Evidence from a survey of 23 European countries. Global Environmental Change, 59, 102003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102003

Search via ReFindit


Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2013). The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychological Science, 24(1), 56-62 https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612449177

Search via ReFindit


Fisher, S. D., Kenny, J., Poortinga, W., Böhm, G., & Steg, L. (2022). The politicisation of climate change attitudes in Europe. Electoral Studies, 79, 102499 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102499

Search via ReFindit


Flora, D. B., & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 466-491 https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466

Search via ReFindit


Fraembs, T. V., & Drobnič, S. (2024). Ill-informed or ideologically driven? Climate change awareness and denial in Europe. Population and Environment, 46, Article 21 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-024-00462-7

Search via ReFindit


Franzen, A., & Vogl, D. (2013). Acquiescence and the willingness to pay for environmental protection: A comparison of the ISSP, WVS, and EVS. Social Science Quarterly, 94(3), 637-659 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2012.00903.x

Search via ReFindit


Gromet, D. M., Kunreuther, H., & Larrick, R. P. (2013). Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(23), 9314-9319 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218453110

Search via ReFindit


Hardisty, D. J., Johnson, E. J., & Weber, E. U. (2010). A dirty word or a dirty world? Attribute framing, political affiliation, and query theory. Psychological Science, 21(1), 86-92 https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609355572

Search via ReFindit


Haws, K. L., Winterich, K. P., & Naylor, R. W. (2014). Seeing the world through GREEN-tinted glasses: Green consumption values and responses to environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(3), 336-354 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2013.11.002

Search via ReFindit


Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307-337 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600

Search via ReFindit


Kahan, D. M. (2012). Why we are poles apart on climate change. Nature, 488(7411), 255 https://doi.org/10.1038/488255a

Search via ReFindit


Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239-260 https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401

Search via ReFindit


Koos, S. (2012). What drives political consumption in Europe? A multi-level analysis on individual characteristics, opportunity structures and globalization. Acta Sociologica, 55(1), 37-57 https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699311431594

Search via ReFindit


Li, C.-H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936-949 https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7

Search via ReFindit


Lorek, S., & Fuchs, D. (2013). Strong sustainable consumption governance – precondition for a degrowth path? Journal of Cleaner Production, 38, 36-43 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.08.008

Search via ReFindit


Lumley, T. (2004). Analysis of complex survey samples. Journal of Statistical Software, 9(1), 1-19 https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v009.i08

Search via ReFindit


Mannoni, E. (2025). “I’m worried, but”: Unpacking the gap between environmental concern and pro-environmental behavior. Swiss Political Science Review, 31(4), 644-665 https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12660

Search via ReFindit


McCright, A. M., Dunlap, R. E., & Marquart-Pyatt, S. T. (2016). Political ideology and views about climate change in the European Union. Environmental Politics, 25(2), 338-358 https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1090371

Search via ReFindit


Poortinga, W., Whitmarsh, L., Steg, L., Böhm, G., & Fisher, S. (2019). Climate change perceptions and their individual-level determinants: A cross-European analysis. Global Environmental Change, 55, 25-35 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.01.007

Search via ReFindit


Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71-90 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004

Search via ReFindit


Saari, U. A., Damberg, S., Frömbling, L., & Ringle, C. M. (2021). Sustainable consumption behavior of Europeans: The influence of environmental knowledge and risk perception on environmental concern and behavioral intention. Ecological Economics, 189, 107155 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107155

Search via ReFindit


Schmidt-Catran, A. W., & Fairbrother, M. (2016). The random effects in multilevel models: Getting them wrong and getting them right. European Sociological Review, 32(1), 23-38 https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcv090

Search via ReFindit


Stolle, D., Hooghe, M., & Micheletti, M. (2005). Politics in the supermarket: Political consumerism as a form of political participation. International Political Science Review, 26(3), 245-269 https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512105053784

Search via ReFindit


Syed, S., Acquaye, A., Khalfan, M. M., Obuobisa-Darko, T., & Yamoah, F. A. (2024). Decoding sustainable consumption behavior: A systematic review of theories and models and provision of a guidance framework. Resources, Conservation and Recycling Advances, 23, 200232 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2024.200232

Search via ReFindit


van Buuren, S., & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011). mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3), 1-67 https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03

Search via ReFindit


White, I. R., Royston, P., & Wood, A. M. (2011). Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice. Statistics in Medicine, 30(4), 377-399 https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4067

Search via ReFindit


Wilska, T.-A., Rantala, E., & Nyrhinen, J. (2025). Profiles of green and non-green consumers: A three-country study. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 16, 100260 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2025.100260

Search via ReFindit


World Values Survey Association. (2017–2022). World Values Survey, Wave 7: Data and documentation https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV7.jsp

Search via ReFindit


World Values Survey Association. (2017–2022). World Values Survey: Round Seven, Country-Pooled Datafile (Version 6.0.0) [Data set]. JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat https://doi.org/10.14281/18241.24

Search via ReFindit


Wyss, A. M., Knoch, D., & Berger, S. (2022). When and how pro-environmental attitudes turn into behavior: The role of costs, benefits, and self-control. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 79, 101748 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101748

Search via ReFindit