Received:
2019-11-18 | Accepted:
2020-03-23 | Published:
2020-06-30
Title
The importance of innovative tools application in the development of state tax audit
Abstract
The aim of the study is to develop theoretical and methodological approaches, implementation mechanism and scientific and practical recommendations for improving the state tax audit and tax administration in the conditions of innovative development. The main results are obtained and accurately reasoned using the methods of theoretical research, comparative analysis, statistical and econometric methods, methods of induction and deduction, tabular and graphical methods. The authors identify the interaction model between tax and innovation systems at the international level. In addition, during the study the evaluation methodology of the governmental tax audit effectiveness were developed and tested, using the example of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The main directions of innovation development of the state tax audit and analysis of the scenario of the consequences of implementation are determined. The scientific novelty of this study is to develop assessment methodology of the state tax audit efficiency and identify approaches to improvement based on innovative tools. The study results are valuable from the point of view of subsequent developments in the space of state financial control.
Keywords
state tax audit, efficiency, integral coefficient, scenario analysis, innovative development
JEL classifications
C43
, H11
, H21
, K34
, O38
URI
http://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/552
DOI
Pages
2764-2783
This is an open access issue and all published articles are licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
Accounts Committee of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2018. http://esep.kz/eng
Search via ReFindit
Artificial intelligence enterning the world of tax. 2017. Deloitte.
Search via ReFindit
Bekkers, V. 2017. Modernization, public innovation and information and communication technologies: the emperor’s new clothes. Information Polity, 12(24), 103–107. https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1412610
Search via ReFindit
Brennan, N. M. (2019). Corporate Governance Implications of Disruptive Technology: An Overview. The British Accounting Review, 100860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2019.100860
Search via ReFindit
Buchmann, M. 2017. The need for competition between decentralized governance approaches for data exchange in smart electricity grids—Fiscal federalism vs. polycentric governance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 139, 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.05.011
Search via ReFindit
Chen, P., Chu, A. C., Chu, H., & Lai, C. 2017. Short-run and long-run effects of capital taxation on innovation and economic growth. Journal of Macroeconomics, 53, 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2017.07.002
Search via ReFindit
Chen, Shannon and De Simone, Lisa and Hanlon, Michelle and Lester, Rebecca, The Effect of Innovation Box Regimes on Income Shifting and Real Activity (June 2, 2019). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3486428
Search via ReFindit
Conclusion to the Republic of Kazakhstan Government report on the republican budget execution. 2017. Astana. http://esep.kz/ckfinder/userfiles/files/%D0%97%D0%90%D0%9A%D0%9B%D0%AE%D0%A7%D0%95%D0%9D%D0%98%D0%95.pdf
Search via ReFindit
Damanpour, F., Schneider M. 2018. Characteristics of Innovation and Innovation Adoption in Public Organizations: Assessing the Role of Managers, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 495–522. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mun021
Search via ReFindit
Demirhan, H. 2019. Effective Taxation System by Blockchain Technology. In: Hacioglu U. (eds) Blockchain Demircioglu, M. A., & Audretsch, D. B. (2017). Conditions for innovation in public sector organizations. Research Policy, 46(9), 1681–1691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.004
Search via ReFindit
Dutton, Wh., Eynon, R. 2016. Networked individuals and institutions: a cross-sector comparative perspective on patterns and strategies in government and research. Information Society, 25(3), 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240902848914
Search via ReFindit
Economics and Financial Market Innovation. Contributions to Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25275-5_17
Search via ReFindit
Federal tax service of Russia. https://www.nalog.ru/
Search via ReFindit
Feller, J., Finnegan, P., Nilsson, O. 2018. Open innovation and public administration: transformational typologies and business model impacts. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(12), 358–374. 10.1057/ejis.2010.65
Search via ReFindit
Foley, P., Alfonso, X. 2018. eGovernment and the transformation agenda. Public Administration, 87(2): 371–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.01749.x
Search via ReFindit
Galvin, P. (2019). Local government, multilevel governance, and cluster‐based innovation policy: Economic cluster strategies in Canada’s city regions. Canadian Public Administration, 62(1), 122–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12314
Search via ReFindit
Gersbach, H., Schetter, U., & Schneider, M. T. (2018). Taxation, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. The Economic Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12588
Search via ReFindit
Global innovation index 2018. Energizing the World with Innovation 11th edition. https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/gii-2018-report
Search via ReFindit
Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore. https://www.iras.gov.sg/
Search via ReFindit
INSEAD, WIPO, Cornell University: The Global Innovation Index 2017. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2017.pdf
Search via ReFindit
Islamutdinov, V.F. 2018. Innovation and taxation: common ground. Tax policy and practice, 4(7), 20-23.
Search via ReFindit
Jia, N., Huang, K. G.-L., & Zhang, C. M. (2018). Public Governance, Corporate Governance, and Firm Innovation: An Examination of State-Owned Enterprises. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0543
Search via ReFindit
Lobanov, V.V. 2017. Modernization of public administration: problems and solutions. Issues of state and municipal government, 2(11), 136-145. http://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/2011/11/28/1270196804/%D0%9B%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%20136-145.pdf
Search via ReFindit
Nash, J. F. 1951. Non-Cooperative Games. The Annals of Mathematics, 54(2), 286-295.
Search via ReFindit
Publication 1075. Tax Information Security Guidelines for Federal, State and Local Agencies. Safeguards for Protecting Federal Tax Returns and Return Informatio. Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service. https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p1075.pdf
Search via ReFindit
Rusaw, C.A. 2017. Changing public organizations: four approaches. International Journal of Public Administration, 5(30), 347–361.
Search via ReFindit
State revenue committee of Ministry of finance of the Republic of Kazakhstan. http://kgd.gov.kz/en
Search via ReFindit
Statistics Committee of Ministry of national economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan. http://stat.gov.kz/
Search via ReFindit
The World Bank database. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/GC.TAX.TOTL.GD.ZS
Search via ReFindit
Zang, L., Xiong, F., Lao, X., & Gao, Y. 2018. Does governance efficiency matter for national innovative capacity? One tale from different countries. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2018.1493450
Search via ReFindit
RSS 1.0