References
Atari, S. & Prause, G. 2018. Risk assessment of emission abatement technologies for clean shipping. In International Conference on Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication (pp. 93-101). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74454-4_9
Search via ReFindit
Atari, S., Bakkar, Y., Olaniyi, E.O. & Prause, G. 2019. Real options analysis of abatement investments for sulphur emission control compliance, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(3), 1062-1087, https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.6.3(1)
Search via ReFindit
Atkinson, G., & Mourato, S. 2008. Environmental cost-benefit analysis. Annual review of environment and resources, 33, 317-344. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.33.020107.112927
Search via ReFindit
Beaton, S. P., Bishop, G. A., Zhang, Y., Ashbaugh, L. L., Lawson, D. R., & Stedmam, D. H. 1995. On-road vehicle emissions: regulations, costs, and benefits. Science, 268(5213), 991-993. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2888864
Search via ReFindit
Benshalom, I. 2006. Sourcing the Unsourceable: The Cost Sharing Regulations and the Sourcing of Affiliated Intangible-Related Transactions. Va. Tax Rev., 26, 631.
Search via ReFindit
Bonetto, P.; Hofmann, B.; Prause, G. 2014. Rise and fall of the Lyon silk cluster: A case study about entrepreneurial sustainability. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 2(1), 1−11. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2014.2.1(1)
Search via ReFindit
BPO 2017. World LNG Report. https://www.igu.org/sites/default/files/103419-World_IGU_Report_no%20crops.pdf
Search via ReFindit
Carr, E. W., & Corbett, J. J. 2015. Ship compliance in emission control areas: technology costs and policy instruments. Environmental science & technology, 49(16), 9584-9591. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02151
Search via ReFindit
Chung, S. 2014. Environmental regulation and foreign direct investment: Evidence from South Korea. Journal of Development Economics, 108, 222-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2014.01.003
Search via ReFindit
Cole, M. A., & Elliott, R. J. 2003. Do environmental regulations influence trade patterns? Testing old and new trade theories. World Economy, 26(8), 1163-1186. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9701.00567
Search via ReFindit
Concawe 2016. Maritime fuel facts, Brussels. https://www.marinefuels2020.com/member/concawe
Search via ReFindit
Dechezleprêtre, A., & Sato, M. 2017. The impacts of environmental regulations on competitiveness. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 11(2), 183-206. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rex013
Search via ReFindit
Demil, B. and Lecocq, X. (2010). Business model evolution: in search of dynamic consistency. Long range planning, 43(2), 227-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2010.02.004
Search via ReFindit
Demirguc-Kunt, A., Laeven, L., & Levine, R. 2003. Regulations, market structure, institutions, and the cost of financial intermediation (No. w9890). National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w9890
Search via ReFindit
Deringer, H. 2014. Cost-benefit analyses in trade regulation: How to assess the health impacts of non-tariff measures?
Search via ReFindit
ECG 2019. Bunker prices. http://ecgassociation.eu/Publications-Reports/General/Fuel-Prices/Bunker-Prices
Search via ReFindit
EfficienSea2 2016. Report on the available technologies and sensors that can be utilized in the new system and on business model on incentives for monitoring and enforcement. http://efficiensea2.org/publications/
Search via ReFindit
GCF 2018. Incremental cost methodology: potential approaches for the Green Climate Fund, Green Climare Fund, GCF/B.19/34, Korea.
Search via ReFindit
Gollop, F. M., & Roberts, M. J. 1983. Environmental regulations and productivity growth: The case of fossil-fueled electric power generation. Journal of political Economy, 91(4), 654-674. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1831072
Search via ReFindit
Goodstein, E., & Hodges, H. 1997. Polluted data: Overestimating environmental costs. American Prospect, (35), 64-64.
Search via ReFindit
Hahn, R. W. 1998. Policy watch: government analysis of the benefits and costs of regulation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(4), 201-210. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2646905
Search via ReFindit
Hämäläinen, E. 2015. Estimated impacts of the sulphur directive on the Nordic industry. European Transport Research Review 7(8). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-015-0158-4
Search via ReFindit
Hammitt, J. K. 2000. Are the costs of proposed environmental regulations overestimated? Evidence from the CFC phase-out. Environmental and resource Economics, 16(3), 281-302. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008352022368
Search via ReFindit
HELCOM 2018. Maritime Assessment 2018 - HELCOM Assessment on maritime activities in the Baltic Sea 2018”, Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings No.152. Helsinki Commission, Helsinki. 253pp.
Search via ReFindit
Hunke, K.; Prause, G. 2014. Sustainable supply chain management in German automotive industry: Experiences and success factors, Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 3(3), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2014.3.3(2)
Search via ReFindit
IEA 2017. Tracking Clean Energy Progress 2017, International Energy Agency, OECD/IEA, Paris. https://www.iea.org/etp/tracking2017/
Search via ReFindit
IMO 2008. Revised MARPOL Annex VI: Regulations for the prevention of air pollution from ships and NOx technical code. London: IMO Marine Environmental Protection Committee (MEPC). /Documents/MEPC.176(58).pdf http://www.imo.org/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/Marine-Environment-Protection-Committee-(MEPC)
Search via ReFindit
IMO 2009. Second IMO GHG Study. 2009. London, UK, April 2009; Buhaug, Ø., Corbett, J.J., Endresen, Ø., Eyring, V., Faber, J., Hanayama, S., Lee, D.S., Lee, D., Lindstad, H., Markowska, A.Z., Mjelde, A., Nelissen, D., Nilsen, J., Pålsson, C., Winebrake, J.J., Wu, W., Yoshida, K.
Search via ReFindit
IMO 2013. Sulphur oxides (SOx)—Regulation 14. -Regulation-14.aspx http://www.imo.org/OurWork/Environment/PollutionPrevention/AirPollution/Pages/Sulphur-oxides-(SOx)
Search via ReFindit
IMO 2016. IMO sets 2020 date for ships to comply with low sulphur fuel oil requirement. Press briefng release 28/10/2016. http://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/PressBriefngs/Pages/MEPC-70-2020sulphur.aspx
Search via ReFindit
Jalkanen, J.-P., Brink, A., Kalli, J., Pettersson, H., Kukkonen, J. and Stipa, T. 2009. A modelling system for the exhaust emissions of marine traffic and its application to the Baltic Sea area. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 9 (2009) 9209-9223. www.atmos-chem-phys.net/9/9209/2009/
Search via ReFindit
Jalkanen, J.P., Johansson, L., Kukkonen, J., Brink, A., Kalli, J., & Stipa, T. 2012. Extension of assessment model of ship traffic exhaust emissions for particulate matter and carbon monoxide. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 12(2012) 2641-2659. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2641-2012
Search via ReFindit
Jiang L., Kronbak J., Christensen L. P. 2014. The costs and benefits of sulphur reduction measures: Sulphur scrubbers versus marine gas oil. Transportation Research Part D, Vol. 28, pp. 19–27. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2641-2012
Search via ReFindit
Johansson L. & Jalkanen J. P. 2016. Emissions from Baltic Sea shipping in 2015, Baltic Sea Environment Fact Sheet 2016, HELCOM, Helsinki. http://www.helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/environment-fact-sheets/maritime-activities/emissions-from-baltic-sea-shipping
Search via ReFindit
Johansson L., Jalkanen J.-P., Kalli J. & Kukkonen J. 2013. The evolution of shipping emissions and the costs of recent and forthcoming emission regulations in the northern European emission control area. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 13(2013) 11375-11389. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11375-2013
Search via ReFindit
Kalli, J., Jalkanen, J.-P., Johansson, L. & Repka, S., 2013. Atmospheric emissions of European SECA shipping: long-term projections. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 12(2), pp. 129-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-013-0050-9
Search via ReFindit
Keeney, R. 1997. Estimating fatalities induced by the economic costs of regulations. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14(1), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007754402585
Search via ReFindit
Keskonna inspektsioon 2017. Tallinn, https://www.kki.ee
Search via ReFindit
Lähteenmäki-Uutela, A., Yliskylä-Peuralahti, J., Repka, S., & Mellqvist, J. 2019a. What explains SECA compliance: rational calculation or moral judgment? WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-019-00163-1
Search via ReFindit
Lähteenmäki-Uutela, A.; Yliskylä-Peuralahti, J.; Olaniyi, E.; Haukioja, T.; Repka, S.; Prause, G.; De Andres Gonzalez, O. 2019b. The impacts of the sulphur emission regulation on the sulphur emission abatement innovation system in the Baltic Sea region. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 1−14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01684-2
Search via ReFindit
Lee, S. I. 2017. Improving Regulatory Governance Trends, Practices and the Way Forward. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264280366-en
Search via ReFindit
Martin, R. and Sunley, P. 1998. Slow convergence? The new endogenous growth theory and regional development. Economic geography, 74(3), 201-227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.1998.tb00113.x
Search via ReFindit
Nugraha, F. 2009. Effective implementation of emission control area towards cleaner shipping operations: focusing on sulphur oxides (SOx) emission reduction. World Maritime University Dissertations. 186.
Search via ReFindit
OECD 2005. Network, Standard Cost Model. International standard cost model manual. Measuring and reducing administrative burdens for businesses.
Search via ReFindit
OECD/ITF 2016. Reducing Sulphur Emissions from Ships: The Impact of International Regulation. http://www.itf-oecd.org/reducing-sulphur-emissions-ships-impact-international-regulation
Search via ReFindit
Olaniyi, E. O, Bakkar, Y. & Prause, G. 2019. Entrepreneurial Compliance Opportunities for Maritime Fuel Producers, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues 6(4): 1550-1565. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.6.4(1)
Search via ReFindit
Olaniyi, E. O. 2017. Towards EU 2020: An Outlook of SECA Regulations Implementation in the BSR. Baltic Journal of European Studies, 7 (2), 182−207. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2017-0016
Search via ReFindit
Olaniyi, E. O., & Prause, G. 2019. SECA Regulatory Impact Assessment: Administrative Burden Costs in the Baltic Sea Region. Transport and Telecommunication Journal, 20(1), 62-73. https://doi.org/10.2478/ttj-2019-0006
Search via ReFindit
Olaniyi, E., Prause, G. & Boyesen, J. 2018a. The impact of SECA regulations on clean shipping in the BSR. In: Ölçer, A, Kitada, O., Dalaklis, D., Ballini, F., (eds.) Trends and Challenges in Maritime Energy Management book series of WMU Studies in Maritime Affairs 6(1) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74576-3
Search via ReFindit
Olaniyi, E.O., Atari, S. & Prause, G. 2018b. Maritime energy contracting for clean shipping. Transport and Telecommunication, 19(1), 31−44. https://doi.org/10.2478/ttj-2018-0004
Search via ReFindit
Platts Shipping special report 2016. The IMO’s 2020 global cap. What a 2020 sulphur–constrained world means for shipping lines, refineries and bunker suppliers. https://www.isemar.fr/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/SR-IMO-2020-Global-sulfur-cap-102016.pdf
Search via ReFindit
Prause, G.; Reinhold, K.; Järvis, M.; Olaniyi, E.; Tint, P. 2019. The Socio-Economic Impact of Green Shipping: A Holistic View from the Baltic Sea Region. In: Kabashkin, I.; Yatskiv, I. (Ed.). Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12450-2_59
Search via ReFindit
Pray, C. E., Bengali, P., & Ramaswami, B. 2005. The cost of biosafety regulations: the Indian experience. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, 44(3), 267-290.
Search via ReFindit
Renda, A. 2017. One-step forward, two steps back? The new US regulatory budgeting rules in light of the international experience. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 8(3), 291-304. https://doi.org/10.1017/bca.2017.18
Search via ReFindit
Renda, A., Schrefler, L., Luchetta, G. and Zavatta, R. 2013. Assessing the Costs and Benefits of Regulation. Brüssel: Centre for European Policy Studies. Online erhältlich unter: http://ec.Europa.eu/smartregulation/impact/commission_guidelines/docs/131210_cba_study_sg_final
Search via ReFindit
Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 1998. Corporate strategies and environmental regulations: An organizing framework. Strategic management journal, 19(4), 363-375. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3094073
Search via ReFindit
Stopford, M. 2016. Maritime Economics, 3rd edition, Routledge London and New York. 2016.
Search via ReFindit
Sunding, D. L. 1996. Measuring the marginal cost of non-uniform environmental regulations. American journal of Agricultural economics, 78(4), 1098-1107. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3094073
Search via ReFindit
Trafikanalys. 2016. Fuels in the Baltic Sea after SECA. The Swedish government agency for transport policy analysis. 2016:12, Stockholm. https://www.trafa.se/en/public-transport-and-publicly-financed-travel/
Search via ReFindit
Wenske, C. 2018. Statistical analysis of foreign trade flows and maritime transport. Baltic Marine Consult Ltd. Rostock. EnviSum Project WP 5.2.
Search via ReFindit
Winter, S. C., & May, P. J. 2001. Motivation for compliance with environmental regulations. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: The Journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, 20(4), 675-698. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.1023
Search via ReFindit
Wiśnicki, B., Czermański, E., Droździecki, S., Matczak, M., Spangenberg, E. 2014. Sulphur Regulation–technology solutions and economic consequences for the Baltic Sea Region shipping market. In: Ernest Czermański (ed.) Institute of Maritime Transport and Sea-borne Trade, University of Gdańsk.
Search via ReFindit
Xing, Y., & Kolstad, C. D. 2002. Do lax environmental regulations attract foreign investment? Environmental and Resource Economics, 21(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014537013353
Search via ReFindit