ESC
Clarivate

 
Source: Journal Citation ReportsTM from ClarivateTM 2022

Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues Open access
Journal Impact FactorTM (2022) 1.7
Journal Citation IndicatorTM (2022) 0.42
Received: 2019-02-14  |  Accepted: 2019-05-20  |  Published: 2019-06-30

Title

Negative screening and sustainable portfolio diversification


Abstract

A critical issue for socially responsible investors is the selection of the potential companies to invest in. For retail investors, the easiest and more intuitive option is to apply a negative screening approach to avoid investing in companies with bad reputation. In this line, companies involved in scandals regarding irresponsible activities which have become notorious in the mass media will be excluded from the potential companies. Implementing this process in a consistent and objectivity way is not an easy task, especially with worldwide portfolios. Nevertheless, there already exist complex databases which offer sensitive information to investors. This paper describes one of these databases. Furthermore, the problems of implementing such a negative screening methodology are presented, which are mainly related with the proper diversification of the resulting investment portfolios.


Keywords

negative screening, bad reputation, negative media stories, ESG, controversies, sustainability, social corporate responsibility


JEL classifications

G15 , Q56


URI

http://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/305


DOI


Pages

1566-1586


This is an open access issue and all published articles are licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Authors

Arribas, Iván
University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain https://www.uv.es
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Espinós-Vañó, María Dolores
Polytechnic University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain http://www.upv.es
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

García, Fernando
Polytechnic University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain http://www.upv.es
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Tamošiūnienė, Rima
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VILNIUS TECH), Vilnius, Lithuania https://vilniustech.lt
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Journal title

Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues

Volume

6


Number

4


Issue date

June 2019


Issue DOI


ISSN

ISSN 2345-0282 (online)


Publisher

VšĮ Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, Vilnius, Lithuania

Cited

Google Scholar

Article views & downloads

HTML views: 4662  |  PDF downloads: 2039

References


Achim, M.; Borlea, S.; & Mare, C. 2016. Corporate governance and business performance: Evidence for the Romanian economy, Journal of Business Economics and Management 17(3): 458-474. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2013.834841

Search via ReFindit


Baccaro, L.; & Mele, V. 2011. For lack of anything better? International organizations and global corporate codes, Public Administration 89: 451-470. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01918.x

Search via ReFindit


Ballestero, E.; Bravo, M.; Pérez-Gladish, B.; Arenas-Parra, M.; & Plá-Santamaría, D. 2012. Socially responsable investment: A multicriteria approach to portfolio selection combining ethical and financial objectives, European Journal of Operational Research 216 (2): 487-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.07.011

Search via ReFindit


Benson, K.L; Brailsford, T.J.; & Humphrey, J.E. 2006. Do socially responsible fund managers really invest differently? Journal of Business Ethics 65: 337-357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-0003-8

Search via ReFindit


Berry, R.H.; & Yeung, F. 2013. Are investors willing to sacrifice cash for morality? Journal of Business Ethics 117(3): 477-492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1529-6

Search via ReFindit


Bertrand, P.; & Lapointe, V. 2014. How performance of risk-based strategies is modified by socially responsible investment universe? International Review of Financial Analysis 38: 175- 190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2014.11.009

Search via ReFindit


Calvo, C.; Ivorra, C.; & Liern, V. 2016. Fuzzy portfolio selection with non-financial goals: exploring the efficient frontier, Annals of Operations Research 245(1-2): 31-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1561-2

Search via ReFindit


Cervelló-Royo, R.; Guijarro, F.; & Martínez-Gómez, V. 2017. Social performance considered within the global performance of microfinance institutions: a new approach, Operational Research: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-017-0360-3

Search via ReFindit


Charlo, M.; Moya, I.; & Muñoz, A. 2017. Financial performance of socially responsible firms: The short- and long-term impact, Sustainability 9(9): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091622

Search via ReFindit


Charlo, M.J.; Moya, I.; & Muñoz, A.M. 2015. Sustainable development and corporate financial performance: A study based on the FTSE4Good IBEX index, Business Strategy and the Environment 24: 277-288. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1824

Search via ReFindit


Chatterji, A.K.; Levine, D.I.; & Toffel, M.W. 2009. How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 18(1): 125-169.

Search via ReFindit


Diouf, D.; Hebb, T.; & Touré, E. 2016. Exploring factors that influence social retail investors’ decisions: Evidence from Desjardins Fund, Journal of Business Ethics 134(1): 45-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2307-4

Search via ReFindit


Dobrovolskiene, M.; Tvaronaviciene, M.; Tamosiuniene, R. (2017). Tackling projects on sustainability: A Lithuanian case study, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues 4(4): 477-488. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2017.4.4(6)

Search via ReFindit


Escrig-Olmedo, E.; Muñoz-Torres M.J.; Fernández-Izquierdo, M.A.; & Rivera-Lirio, J.M. 2017. Measuring corporate environmental performance: A methodology for sustainable development, Business Strategy and the Environment 26(2): 142-162. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1904

Search via ReFindit


Espinós- Vañó, M.D.; & García, F. 2018. Irresponsible behavior of Spanish FTSE4Good IBEX companies based on NGO reports. 10th International Scientific Conference “Business and Management 2018”. May 3-4, Vilnius, Lithuania. VGTU Press.

Search via ReFindit


Espinós- Vañó, M.D.; García, F.; & Oliver, J. 2018. The ethical index Ftse4Good Ibex as an alternative for passive portfolio strategies in Spain, Finance, Markets and Valuation 4(1): 117-129.

Search via ReFindit


Espinós-Vañó, M.D. 2016. Socially responsible investment in Spain: Ethics and transparency, Finance, Markets and Valuation 2(2): 73-89.

Search via ReFindit


García-Martínez. G.; Guijarro, F.; & Poyatos, J. 2017. Measuring the social responsibility of European companies: A goal programming approach, International Transactions in Operational Research: 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12438

Search via ReFindit


García-Melón, M.; Pérez-Gladish, B.; Gómez-Navarro, T.; & Mendez-Rodriguez, P. 2016. Assessing mutual funds’ corporate responsibility: a multistakeholder-AHP based methodology, Annals of Operations Research 244(2): 475-503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2132-5

Search via ReFindit


Global Sustainable Investment Alliance. 2016. Global Sustainable Investment Review.

Search via ReFindit


Gómez-Bezares, F.; Przychodzen, W.; & Przychodzen, J. 2016. Corporate sustainability and shareholder wealth: Evidence from British companies and lessons from the crisis, Sustainability 8(3): 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8030276

Search via ReFindit


González, J.M.; Ruiz, F.; Méndez-Rodríguez, P.; & Pérez Gladish, B. 2014. Interactive socially responsible portfolio selection: An application to the Spanish stock market, INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research 52(3): 126-137. https://doi.org/10.3138/infor.52.3.126

Search via ReFindit


Hellsten, S.; & Mallin, C; 2006. Are "ethical" or "socially responsible" investments socially responsible? Journal of Business Ethics 66: 393-406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-0001-x

Search via ReFindit


Jankalová, M.; & Jankal, R. 2017. The assessment of corporate social responsibility: approaches analysis, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues 4(4): 441-459. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2017.4.4(4)

Search via ReFindit


Kutay, N.; & Tektüfekçi, F. 2016. A new era for sustainable development: A comparison for sustainability indices, Journal of Accounting, Finance and Auditing Studies, 2: 70-95.

Search via ReFindit


Lamata, M.; Liern, V.; & Pérez-Gladish, B. 2018. Doing good by doing well: a MCDM framework for evaluation corporate social responsibility attractiveness, Annals of Operations Research 267(1-2): 249-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2271-8

Search via ReFindit


Lean, H. H.; Ang, W. R.; & Smyth, R. 2015. Performance and performance persistence of socially responsible investment funds in Europe and North America, North American Journal of Economics and Finance 34: 254-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2015.09.011

Search via ReFindit


Lesser, K; Rössle, F.; & Walkshäusl, C. 2016. Socially responsible, green, faith-based investment strategies: Screening activity matters! Finance Research Letters 16: 171-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2015.11.001

Search via ReFindit


Lin, S., & Hsu, M. 2018. Decision making by extracting soft information from CSR news report. Technological & Economic Development of Economy 24(4): 1344-1361. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2018.3121

Search via ReFindit


Macikova, L.; Smorada, M.; Dorčák, P.; Beug, B.; & Markovič, P. 2018. Financial aspects of sustainability: An evidence from Slovak companies, Sustainability 10(7): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072274

Search via ReFindit


Nainggolan, Y.; How, J; & Verhoeven, P. 2016. Ethical screening and financial performance: The case of Islamic equity funds, Journal of Business Ethics 137(1): 83-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2529-5

Search via ReFindit


Ou, Y. 2016. Using a hybrid decision-making model to evaluate the sustainable development performance of high-tech listed companies, Journal of Business Economics and Management 17 (3): 331-346. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2015.1110713

Search via ReFindit


Pérez-Gladish, B.; Benson, K.; & Faff, R. 2012. Profiling socially responsible investors: Australian evidence, Australian Journal of Management 37(2): 189-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896211429158

Search via ReFindit


Reddy, K.; Mirza, N.; Naqvi, B.; & Fu, M. 2017. Comparative risk adjusted performance of Islamic, socially responsible and conventional funds: Evidence from United Kingdom, Economic Modelling 66: 233-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.07.007

Search via ReFindit


Renneboog, L.; Horst, J.T.; & Zhang, C. 2008. Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance and investor behavior, Journal of Banking and Finance 32(9): 1723-1742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.12.039

Search via ReFindit


Renneboog, L.; Ter Horst, J.; & Zhang, C. 2011. Is ethical money financially Smart? Nonfinancial attributes and money flows of socially responsible investment funds, Journal of Financial Intermediation 20(4): 562-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2010.12.003

Search via ReFindit


Rodriguez-Fernandez, M. 2016. Social responsibility and financial performance: The role of good corporate governance, BRQ Business Research Quarterly 19(2): 137-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2015.08.001

Search via ReFindit


Schwartz, M.S. 2003. The “ethics” of ethical investing, Journal of Business Ethics 43(3): 195-213. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022933912939

Search via ReFindit


Silvestre, W.J.; Antunes, A.; & Leal Filho, W. 2016. The corportae sustainability typology: Analysing sustainability drivers and fostering sustainability at enterprises. Technological and Economic Development of Economy 24(2): 513-533. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2016.1213199

Search via ReFindit


Simionescu, L.; & Dumitrescu, D. 2018. Empirical study towards corporate social responsibility practices and company financial performance. Evidence for companies listed on the Bucharest stock exchange, Sustainability 10(9): 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093141

Search via ReFindit


Slapikaite, I.; & Tamosiuniene, R. 2013. Socially responsable mutual funds: A profitable way of investing. Analele Stiintifice ale Universitatii Al I Cuza din Iasi - Sectiunea Stiinte Economice 60(1): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.2478/aicue-2013-0017

Search via ReFindit


Smaliukienė, R.; & Monni, S. 2019. A step-by-step approach to social marketing in energy transition, Insights into Regional Development 1(1): 19-32. https://doi.org/10.9770/ird.2019.1.1(2)

Search via ReFindit


Tebini, H.; M’Zali, B.; Lang, P.; & Perez-Gladish, B. 2016. The economic impact of environmentally responsible practices, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 23: 333-344. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1383

Search via ReFindit


Thomson Reuters 2018. Thomson Reuters ESG Scores.

Search via ReFindit


Trinks, P.J.; & Scholtens, B. 2017. The opportunity cost of negative screening in socially responsible investing, Journal of Business Ethics 140(2): 193-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2684-3

Search via ReFindit


Wei, F.; Lu, J.; & Kong, Y. 2017. Research on sustainability financial performance of Chinese listed companies, Sustainability 9 (5): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050723

Search via ReFindit


Windolph, S.E. 2011. Assessing corporate sustainability through ratings: challenges and their causes, Journal of Environmental Sustainability 1: 61-80. https://doi.org/10.14448/jes.01.0005

Search via ReFindit


Zhao, C.; Guo, Y.; Yuan, J.; Wu, M.; Li, D.; Zhou, Y.; & Kang, J. 2018. ESG and corporate financial performance: empirical evidence from China’s listed power generation companies, Sustainability 10(8): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082607

Search via ReFindit