Received:
2018-03-15 | Accepted:
2018-09-24 | Published:
2018-12-30
Title
Second pension pillar participants' behaviour: the Lithuanian case
Abstract
Defined contribution pension pillars often require participants to take an active role in selecting pension funds during the whole accumulation period. It is expected that pension a fund participant will select an appropriate investment strategy and investment risk during the different stages of the accumulation phase and depending on the years left until retirement. In this paper, we have analysed the behaviour of second pillar pension fund participants in Lithuania from the establishment of the second pension pillar (2004) till Q3 of 2016. The aim of the study is to evaluate how rational second pension pillar participants were in decisions on selecting the accumulation rate, the appropriate pension fund (investment strategy and investment risk) and changing the pension fund over the accumulation period during various stages of the economic cycle in the financial markets. The results show that the majority of second pension pillar participants are irrational in selecting participation rates. Additionally, it was also observed that the majority of pension fund participants make irrational choices on selecting the pension fund (investment strategy and investment risk) and changing it over the accumulation period. The majority of pension fund participants have selected an inappropriate pension fund (investment strategy and investment risk) with regard to the accumulation period left till retirement. Moreover, participants are passive and tend not to change pension funds during the accumulation period. Pension fund participants who did change pension funds made irrational decisions and chose inappropriate pension funds (investment strategy and investment risk): in case of peak periods in stock markets, the majority of second pension pillar participants changed pension funds by switching from the funds with a lower proportion of equities to those with a higher proportion of equities or changed their pension fund to a fund in the same investment risk category. Moreover, in case of bottom periods in stock markets, the majority of participants did the opposite, switching from funds with a higher proportion of equities to those with a lower proportion of equities.
Keywords
Pension funds, Pension fund participants' choice, behaviour finance, life-cycle investment
JEL classifications
J32
, D14
, D91
URI
http://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/242
DOI
Pages
620-635
Funding
This work was supported by the Research Council of Lithuania under Grant MIP-15204. The research has received funding from Research Council of Lithuania on research project agreement No MIP-012/2015
This is an open access issue and all published articles are licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
Abel, A.; Eberly, J. C.; Panageas, S. 2013. Optimal Inattention to the Stock Market with Information Costs and Transaction Costs, Econometrica 81: 1455-1481. https://doi:10.3982/ECTA7624
Search via ReFindit
Ameriks, J; Zeldes, S. P. 2002. How do household portfolio shares vary with age? TIAA-CREF Working Paper 112(2).
Search via ReFindit
Bank of Lithuania. 2016. [online], [cited 15 November 2017]. Available from Internet: . http://www.lb.lt/en/lb-statistics
Search via ReFindit
Benartzi, S.; Thaler, R. H. 2001. Naive diversification strategies in defined contribution saving plans, American Economic Review 91(1): 79-98.
Search via ReFindit
Betermier, S.; Calvet, L. E.; Sodini, P. 2017. Who Are the Value and Growth Investors? The Journal of Finance 72: 5–46. https://doi:10.1111/jofi.12473
Search via ReFindit
Blake, D.; Wright, I.D.; Zhang, Y. 2014. Age-dependent investing: optimal funding and investment strategies in defined contribution pension plans when members are rational life cycle financial planners, J. Econom. Dynam. Control 38: 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2013.11.001
Search via ReFindit
Bodie, Z.; Merton R. C.; Samuelson W. 1992. Labor Supply Flexibility and Portfolio Choice in a Life-Cycle Model, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 16(3-4): 427-449.
Search via ReFindit
Campbell, J.Y.; Viceira L.M. 2002. Strategic Asset Allocation: Portfolio Choice for Long-Term Investors. Oxford University Press.
Search via ReFindit
Choi, James J.; Laibson, D.; Madrian, B. C.; Metrick, A. 2002. Defined Contribution Pensions: Plan Rules, Participant Choices, and the Path of Least Resistance. Tax Policy and the Economy 16: 67-113. https://doi.org/10.1086/654750
Search via ReFindit
Clark, G.; Strauss, K. 2008. Individual pension-related risk propensities: the effect of socio-demographic characteristics and spousal entitlement on risk attitudes, Ageing and Society 28(6): 847–874.
Search via ReFindit
Collard, S. 2009. Individual Investment Behaviour: A Brief Review of Research. Personal Accounts Delivery Authority.
Search via ReFindit
Dahlquist, M.; Martinez, J. V.; Söderlind, P.2017. Individual Investor Activity and Performance, The Review of Financial Studies 30(3): 866–899. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhw093
Search via ReFindit
Dellavigna S.; Pollet J. 2009. Investor Inattention and Friday Earnings Announcements, Journal of Finance 64: 709-749. https://10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01447.x
Search via ReFindit
Dulebohn, J. H. 2002. An Investigation of the Determinants of Investment Risk Behavior in Employer-Sponsored Retirement Plans, Journal of Management 28(1): 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630202800102
Search via ReFindit
Égert, B. 2012. The impact of changes in second pension pillars on public finances in Central and Eastern Europe. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 942. OECD Publishing, Paris.
Search via ReFindit
Foster, L. 2017. Young People and Attitudes towards Pension Planning, Social Policy and Society 16(1): 65-80. https://doi:10.1017/S1474746415000627
Search via ReFindit
Jonsson, S.; Söderberg, I. L.; Wilhelmsson, M. 2017. An investigation of the impact of financial literacy, risk attitude, and saving motives on the attenuation of mutual fund investors’ disposition bias, Managerial Finance 43(3): 282-298. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-10-2015-0269
Search via ReFindit
Lusardi, A.; Mitchel O. S. 2011. Financial Literacy and Planning: Implications for Retirement Wellbeing, NBER WP17078. https://doi:10.3386/w17078
Search via ReFindit
Lusardi, A.; Mitchell, O. S. 2017. How Ordinary Consumers Make Complex Economic Decisions: Financial Literacy and Retirement Readiness, Quarterly Journal of Finance 07:3. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010139217500082
Search via ReFindit
Maccioni, F. A.; Gudaitis, T. 2014. Contribution options and individual returns after the second pillar pension reform in Lithuania, Transformations in Business and Economics 13, 2B(32B): 591–603.
Search via ReFindit
Mitchell, O. S.; Mottola, G. R.; Utkus, S. P.; Yamaguchi. T. 2009. Default, Framing and Spillover Effects: The Case of Life Cycle Funds in 401(k) Plans, NBER WP15108. https://doi:10.3386/w15108
Search via ReFindit
Peggs K. 2000. Which Pension?: Women, Risk and Pension Choice, The Sociological Review 48(3): 349-364. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.00220
Search via ReFindit
Schooley, D. K.; Worden, D. D. 1999. Investors’ asset allocations vs. life-cycle funds, Financial Analysts Journal 55(5): 37-43.
Search via ReFindit
Tapia, W.; Yermo J. 2007. Implications of Behavioural Economics for Mandatory Individual Account Pension Systems. OECD Working Papers on Insurance and Private Pensions, No. 11, OECD Publishing. https://doi:10.1787/103002825851
Search via ReFindit
Volskis, E. 2012. Reforms of Baltic States pension systems: challenges and benefits [online], [cited 05 December 2017]. Available from Internet: www.ebrd.com/downloads/news/pensionsystem.pdf
Search via ReFindit