ESC
Web of Science
Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues Open Access
Scopus - coverage starting with 2017 material
Received: 2018-03-15  |  Accepted: 2018-10-10  |  Published: 2018-12-30

Title

Evaluation of the efficiency of industrial management in high-technology industries


Abstract

The realization of structural changes in high-technology industries requires an evaluation of the effectiveness of taken decisions. For this purpose, the paper considers the technical and economic feasibility of developing a system of indicators in industrial management, which will allow increasing the competitiveness of products. A set of indicators was developed, based on the formalization of the main characteristics and interrelation of the organizational structure, and an integral estimation of the organizational potential of high-technology enterprises was proposed. The application of such a technique in practice will give a preliminary conclusion about the nature of structural transformations. In developing the methodology, a criterion is proposed for estimating the competitiveness of a high-technology enterprise, which is based on the ratio of its potentials to actual risks. Structurally functional identification of the potentials of the processes of functional systems made it possible to reveal the features of the application of analytical models for determining the accumulated potentials in the production system. This gives the possibility for segmentation of the enterprise's competitiveness and determination of areas with different efficiency of resource consumption.


Keywords

industrial enterprises, high-technology products, produc-tion processes, competitiveness, high-technology industries


JEL classifications

C15 , D21 , D24


URI

http://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/239


DOI


Pages

577-590


Funding

The study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR), project No. 16-06-00028

This is an open access issue and all published articles are licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Authors

Batkovskiy, Aleksandr M.
Central Research Institute of Economy Management and Information Systems "Electronics", Moscow, Russian Federation http://instel.ru
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Efimova, Natalya S.
Moscow Aviation Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation https://en.mai.ru
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Kalachanov, Vyacheslav D.
Moscow Aviation Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation https://en.mai.ru
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Semenova, Elena G.
Saint Petersburg State University of Aerospace Instrumentation, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation http://new.guap.ru
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Fomina, Alena V.
Central Research Institute of Economy Management and Information Systems "Electronics", Moscow, Russian Federation http://instel.ru
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Balashov, Viktor M.
Scientific and Production Enterprise "Radar MMS", Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation http://www.radar-mms.com
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Journal title

Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues

Volume

6


Number

2


Issue date

December 2018


Issue DOI


ISSN

ISSN 2345-0282 (online)


Publisher

VšĮ Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, Vilnius, Lithuania

Cited

Google Scholar

Article views & downloads

HTML views: 227  |  PDF downloads: 173

References


Batkovskiy, A.M.; & Kalachanov, V.D. 2015. Modeling of innovative development of economic systems, Issues of Radio Electronics 2: 258-279.

Search via ReFindit


Batkovskiy, A.M.; Fomina, A.V.; Batkovskiy, M.A.; Klochkov, V.V.; & Semenova, E.G. 2016. Implementation risks in investment projects on boosting high-tech business production capacity: analysis and management, Journal of Applied Economic Sciences 6(44): 1200-1209.

Search via ReFindit


Berger, R. 2014. Industry 4.0. The New Industrial Revolution, Roland Berger Strategy Consultants.

Search via ReFindit


Chen, J.K.C.; Sun, B.S.S.; & Batchuluun, A. 2016. Exploring the influence factors for creation one Knowledge hub of Science Park: Comparison between Silicon Valley and Hsinchu Science Park, In: Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology: Technology Management for Social Innovation, 4-8 Sept. 2016, IEEE, 1156-1171, . https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2016.7806788

Search via ReFindit


De Sousa Damiani, J.H. 2016. Regional development in Brazil and the challenges facing technology-intensive cities: A proposal for a framework of a municipal innovation system, In: Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology: Technology Management for Social Innovation, 4-8 Sept. 2016, IEEE, 510-522, . https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2016.7806558

Search via ReFindit


Efimova, N.S. 2015. Formation of methods of information support of processes of development of science-intensive products in the conditions of information security of the enterprise, Bulletin of the Moscow Aviation Institute 2: 214-220.

Search via ReFindit


Ganjeizadeh, F.; Lei, H.; Goraya, P.; & Olivar, E. 2017. Organizational performance and indicators: trends and opportunities, In: Pellicciari, M., Peruzzini, M. (eds.), 27th International Conference on Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing Modena, Italy, Part 1 of 3, 27-30 June 2017 (FAIM 2017), 1925-1933.

Search via ReFindit


Hong, X.; Zhao, D.; & Wang, Z. 2016. Managing technology licensing for stochastic R&D: from the perspective of an enterprise information system, Enterprise Information Systems 10(8): 845-862, . https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2015.1021855

Search via ReFindit


Huys, R.; Ramioul, M.; & Van Hootegem, G. 2013. High Performance Workplaces: Background Paper for the Third European Company Survey, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Dublin.

Search via ReFindit


Ingvaldsen, J.A. 2015. Organizational Learning: Bringing the Forces of Production Back in, Organization Studies Forthcoming 36(4): 423-444, . https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614561567

Search via ReFindit


Knutstad, G.J.; & Ravn, E. 2014. Technology utilization as competitive advantage – a sociotechnical approach to high performance work systems, Advanced Materials Research, 1039: 555-561, . https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1039.55

Search via ReFindit


Lee, B.H. 2011. The political economics of industrial development in the Korean automotive sector, International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management 11(2): 137-151, . https://doi.org/10.1504/IJATM.2011.039541

Search via ReFindit


Li, C.; Bai, Y.; Xiang, X.; & Xie, X. 2017. To mine coordinated development degrees of high-tech equipment manufacturing industry and logistics industry via an improved grey hierarchy analysis model, Journal of Grey System 29(1): 105-119.

Search via ReFindit


Lyu, J.; Wang, W.; Ren, Y.; Feng, W.; & Zhao, J. 2016. An evaluation method for use phase affordability of aviation equipment, In: International Conference on System Reliability and Science, 15-18 Nov. 2016, 42-45, . https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSRS.2016.7815835

Search via ReFindit


Manturov D.V.; & Efimova, N.S. 2012. The introduction of information systems for science-intensive products for the organization of production in the aircraft industry, Armament and Economics 3(19): 50-55.

Search via ReFindit


McNamara, C. 2018. Organizational Performance management – evaluating and improving organizations. Available at: http://managementhelp.org/organizationalperformance/index.html

Search via ReFindit


Morrissey, R.; Guarraia, P.; Pauwels, V.; & Sampathkuma, S. 2018. Building efficient organizations. Available at: http://www.bain.com/publications/articles/building-efficient-organizations.aspx

Search via ReFindit


Narkunienė, J.; Ulbinaitė, A. 2018. Comparative analysis of company performance evaluation methods, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues 6(1): 125-138. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2018.6.1(10)

Search via ReFindit


Panahifar, F.; Byrne, P.J.; & Heavey, C. 2014. ISM analysis of CPFR implementation barriers, International Journal of Production Research 52(18): 5255-5272, https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.886789

Search via ReFindit


Pokrajac, S.; Nikolić, M.; & Filipović, M. 2016. Industrial competitiveness as a basis of Serbian reindustrialization, Journal of Applied Engineering Science 14(2): 248-259, https://doi.org/10.5937/jaes14-10442

Search via ReFindit


Radu, C. 2018. Modern instruments for measuring organizational performance. Available at: http://www.academia.edu/1628842/Modern_Instruments_For_Measuring_Organizational_Performance

Search via ReFindit


Rolfsen, M.; & Langeland, C. 2012. Successful maintenance practice through team autonomy, Employee Relations 34(3): 306-321, https://doi.org/10.1108/01425451211217725

Search via ReFindit


Silva, F.A.D.; & Borsato, M. 2017. Organizational performance and indicators: Trends and Opportunities Federal University of Technology, Procedia Manufacturing 11: 1925-1932, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.336

Search via ReFindit


Sparrow, P.; & Cooper, C. 2014. Organizational effectiveness, people and performance: new challenges, new research agendas, Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance (Lancaster University) 1(1): 2-13, https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-01-2014-0004

Search via ReFindit


Vonortas, N.; & Zirulia, L. 2015. Strategic technology alliances and networks, Economics of Innovation and New Technology 24(5): 490-509, https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2014.988517

Search via ReFindit