Received:
2018-03-17 | Accepted:
2018-06-15 | Published:
2018-06-30
Title
Peculiarities of anonymous comments’ management: a case study of Lithuanian news portals
Abstract
In the world of today's information technologies, data may spread through cyber space at the speed of lightning. News portals constantly update the information available at their disposal by posting new articles. In order to attract new readers and to retain existing ones, in addition to focussing on publishing quality content, portal managers work on continuously improving their sites. These websites may have various interactive features, among them the opportunity to comment on an article. In some news portals, the number of anonymous comments is particularly high. The activities of online commenters and the issues related to their anonymity have always generated heated discussion owing to a number of reasons, including the content of the comments, the right of the commenters to remain anonymous and the extent to which the portal manager could be held liable. News portals equipped with an anonymous commenting function give rise to a culture of online bullying and hate-mongering where the cyber-criminals feel immune from punishment and existing control measures are insufficient for addressing the problem. The advocates of anonymous commenting argue that it promotes freedom of expression and portal administrators claim they can control defamatory and offensive anonymous comments by deleting them. The article discusses the theoretical aspects of anonymity, anonymous commenting and anonymous comments. Based on a case study of the most popular news portals in Lithuania, and, in particular, on a comparative analysis of the privacy policy and the environment for commenting in three of them, the authors offer empirical data on the ratio between the number of comments and that of the commenters. The main purpose of the article is to reveal the peculiarities of anonymous comments’ management of the news portals that enjoy the greatest popularity in Lithuania.
Keywords
anonymous comments, hate speech, privacy, news portals, internet
JEL classifications
D80
, M15
, M10
URI
http://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/189
DOI
HAL
Pages
875-889
This is an open access issue and all published articles are licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
15 min.lt, 2018. News portal, commenting terms. https://www.15min.lt/komentavimo-taisykles
Search via ReFindit
Ahn, H. 2001. The Effect of Online News Story Comments on Other Readers' Attitudes: Focusing on the Case of Incongruence Between News Tone and Comments. Department of Telecommunication and Film. University of Alabama Libraries. https://ir.ua.edu/bitstream/handle/123456789/1118/file_1.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Search via ReFindit
Alavijeh, M. R. K; Esmaeili, A.; Sepahvand, A.; Davidavičienė, V. 2018. The effect of customer equity drivers on word-of-mouth behavior with mediating role of customer loyalty and purchase intention. Inžinerinė ekonomika = Engineering economics 29(2): 236-246. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.29.2.17718
Search via ReFindit
Alexa.com, 2018. Top Sites in Lithuania. https://www.alexa.com/topsites/countries/LT
Search via ReFindit
Andreoni, J.; Petrie, R. 2004. Public Goods Experiments without Confidentiality: A Glimpse into Fund-Raising. Journal of Public Economics 88(7-8): 1605-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(03)00040-9
Search via ReFindit
Bakker, P. 2010. Journalism without Infrastructure- a Realistic Option?. Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschap 38(3): 250-258. http://dare.uva.nl/search?arno.record.id=381798
Search via ReFindit
Buckels, E. E.; Trapnell, D. P.; Paulhus, L. D. 2014. Trolls just want to have fun. Personality and Individual Differences 6(7): 97-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.016
Search via ReFindit
Cho, D.; & Acquisti, A. 2013. The More Social Cues, The Less Trolling? An Empirical Study of Online Commenting Behavior. Proceedings of the Twelfh Workshop on the Economics of Information Security. Carnegie Mellon University. http://repository.cmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1338&context=heinzworks
Search via ReFindit
Cho, D.; Kim, S. 2012. Empirical analysis of online anonymity and user behaviors: the impact of real name policy. Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. http://www.computer.org/csdl/proceedings/hicss/2012/4525/00/06149194.pdf
Search via ReFindit
Christensson, P. 2011. TechTerms.com, https://techterms.com/definition/ip_address
Search via ReFindit
Delfi.lt, 2018. News portal, commenting terms. https://en.delfi.lt/misc/cc/texts/lt_LT/tos.php
Search via ReFindit
Djuric, N.; Zhou, J.; Morris, R.; Grbovic, M.; Radosavljevic, V.; Bhamidipati, N. 2015. Hate speech detection with comment embeddings. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, May 18 - 22, Florence, Italy. https://doi.org/10.1145/2740908.2742760
Search via ReFindit
Ekstrand, V. S. 2013. The Many Masks of Anon: Anonymity As Cultural Practice and Reflections in Case Law, Journal of Technology Law & Policy, 18(1): 1-36. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2322818
Search via ReFindit
Ferry, A. 2002. Anonymity: The literary history of a word. New Literary History 33(2): 193-214.
Search via ReFindit
Festinger, L. 1954. A theory of social comparison process. Human Relations 7(2): 117-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
Search via ReFindit
Goodman, E. & Cherubini, F. 2013. Online Comment Moderation: Emerging Best Practices, World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers. http://www.wan-ifra.org/reports/2013/10/04/online-comment-moderation-emerging-best-practices
Search via ReFindit
Hanamirian, J. 2012. The Right to Remain Anonymous: Anonymous Speakers, Confidential Sources and the Public Good. Columbia University Academic Commons. https://doi.org/10.7916/D8ZP4GQB
Search via ReFindit
Heatherly, K. A.; Fargo, A. L.; Martin, J. A. 2014. Anonymous Online Comments: The Law and Best Media Practices from Around the World. International Press Institute. https://ipi.media/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/IPI_AnonymousSpeech_Oct2014.pdf
Search via ReFindit
Huang, L. C. 2016. The 2016 Global Report on Online Commenting. The World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers. http://www.wan-ifra.org/private-download/163128
Search via ReFindit
Kardelis, K. 2002. Mokslinių tyrimų metodologija ir metodai [Methodology and methods of scientific research]. 2-asis pataisytas ir papildytas leidimas. Kaunas: Judex.
Search via ReFindit
Kiesler, S.; Kraut, E. R.; Resnick, P.; Kittur A. 2012. Regulating behavior in online communities. Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-Based Social Design. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Search via ReFindit
Kim, E.; & Sun, Y. 2006. The effect of replies in Internet news on the audience. The Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies 50(4): 33-64.
Search via ReFindit
Krysowski, E.; & Tremewan, J. 2015. Anonymity, Social Norms, and Online Harassment. https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.1.3211.8246
Search via ReFindit
Limba, T.; & Šidlauskas, A. 2018. Secure personal data administration in the social networks: the case of voluntary sharing of personal data on the Facebook, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues 5(3): 528-541 https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2018.5.3(9)
Search via ReFindit
Lrytas.lt, 2018. News portal, privacy policy. https://www.lrytas.lt/atsakomybe/
Search via ReFindit
Millen, D. R.; & Patterson, J. F. 2003. Identity disclosure and the creation of social capital. Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/765891.765950
Search via ReFindit
Mishra, A.; & Rastogi, R. 2012. Semi-Supervised Correction of Biased Commenting Ratings, World Wide Web Conference Session: Frau and Bias in User Rating, April 16–20, Lyon, France.
Search via ReFindit
Nobata, C.; Tetreault, J. R.; Thomas, A. O.; Mehdad, Y.; Chang, Y. 2016. Abusive Language Detection in Online User Content http://www.yichang-cs.com/yahoo/WWW16_Abusivedetection.pdf
Search via ReFindit
Nockleby, T. J. 2000. Hate Speech Definition. Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. New York: Macmillan. https://www.encyclopedia.com/politics/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/hate-speech
Search via ReFindit
Rains, S. 2007. The impact of anonymity on perceptions of source credibility and influence in computer-mediated group communication: A test of two competing hypotheses. Communication Research 34(1): 100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650206296084
Search via ReFindit
Raudeliūnienė, J.; Davidavičienė, V.; Tvaronavičienė, M.; Jonuška, L.2018. Evaluation of advertising campaigns on social media networks. Sustainability 10(4): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040973
Search via ReFindit
Reader, B. 2012. Free Press vs. Free Speech? The Rhetoric of ‘Civility’ in Regard to Anonymous Online Comments. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 89(3): 495-513. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699012447923
Search via ReFindit
Reich, Z. 2011. User Comments. The transformation of participatory space. Participatory Journalism: Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers, Chichester: Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444340747.ch6
Search via ReFindit
Reicher, S. D.; Spears, R.; Postmes, T. 1995. A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European review of social psychology 6(1): 161-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779443000049
Search via ReFindit
Santana, D. A. 2014. Virtuous or Vitriolic: The effect of anonymity on civility in online newspaper reader comment boards. Journalism Practice 8(1): 18-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.813194
Search via ReFindit
Šidlauskas, A. 2015. Vartotojų draugiškos aplinkos kūrimo principai ir ypatumai elektroninėse parduotuvėse [User friendly interface creation principles and features on the online shops]. Mykolo Romerio universitetas. http://talpykla.elaba.lt/elaba-fedora/objects/elaba:8430235/datastreams/MAIN/content
Search via ReFindit
Šidlauskas, A. 2017. Vartotojų elektroninių duomenų apsaugos ypatumai [Users electronic data protection features]. Mykolo Romerio universitetas. https://elaba.lvb.lt:443/ELABA:LABTALL:ELABAETD25184230
Search via ReFindit
Šišulák, S. 2017. Userfocus - tool for criminality control of social networks at both the local and international level. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues 5(2): 297-314. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2017.5.2(10)
Search via ReFindit
Solove, J. D. 2007. The Future of Reputation: Gossip, Rumor, and Privacy on the Internet. Yale University Press. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2899125
Search via ReFindit
Suler, J. 2005. The online disinhibition effect. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies 7(3): 321-326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295
Search via ReFindit
The European Court of Human Rights. 2013. Case of Delfi AS v. Estonia. "]} https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"itemid":["001-126635
Search via ReFindit
Tvaronavičienė, M. 2018. Towards sustainable and secure development: energy efficiency peculiarities in transport sector, Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues 7(4): 719-725. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2018.7.4(9)
Search via ReFindit
Weicher, M. 2007. [Name withheld]: Anonymity and its implications. Proceedingsof the American Society for Information Science and Technology 43(1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.1450430189
Search via ReFindit
Yang, H. 2008. The effects of the opinion and quality of user postings on Internet news readers’ attitude toward the news issue. The Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies 52(2): 254-281.
Search via ReFindit
Zeno-Zencovich, V. (January 31, 2014). Anonymous Speech on the Internet, in A. Koltay (ed.), Media Freedom and Regulation in the New Media World, Budapest, Wolters Kluwer, CompLex, 2014, pp.103-116, ISBN: 978 963 295 400 4. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2487735
Search via ReFindit
Zimbardo, P. G. 1969. The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. Nebraska symposium on motivation. University of Nebraska Press. Stanford University.
Search via ReFindit