ESC

Clarivate

JCR Category: Business in ESCI edition

Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues Open access
Journal Impact FactorTM (2025) 1.5 Q3
Journal Citation IndicatorTM (2025) 0.25 Q4
Received: 2025-09-15  |  Accepted: 2025-12-30  |  Published: 2026-03-30

Title

Towards more sustainable product design through consumer experience


Abstract

It is known from various studies that the choice of the drinkware could deeply affect consumer perception during beverage consumption. In our previous study we have demonstrated that there are a lot of differences in the ratings of taste, palatability bitterness and saturation were noted depending on the type of vessel in which beer was served. This study continues our previous research and expands it even further. In this study we test four different types of beer – each one with a different essence content. This is to determine whether glassware type affects customer experience from drinking each type of beer. Four types of beer purchased from different producers were used for the research. Beer samples for evaluation were served in beer mugs with a classic design and solid construction, tall glasses (wheatbeerglasses) with a characteristic elongated shape, and beer goblets (also called tulip glass), distinguished by a short stem and a very large bowl that tapers towards the top. The experimental results showed how the characteristics of a glass could affect beverage bouquet and flavour, and suggest that their rational optimization, based on experimental data, could enhance the consumer enjoyment of it. Taking into account the above studies, certain conclusions can be drawn regarding the research we conducted. Light beer with an essence content 12% served in a tulip glass has been assessed worse in every single tested trait. Odour, taste, saturation, palatability, bitterness and general quality index (GQI) have been perceived worst when the beer was served in tulip glass. It seems that tulip glass is particularly unsuitable for this type of beer. Moreover, sustainability considerations are becoming increasingly relevant in this context. Understanding the interactions between the drink and its container may foster more deliberate and responsible purchasing behavior. The above-mentioned factors also affect the consumer experience that can be created by combining a drink with the right glass.


Keywords

beer quality, glass quality, sensory evaluation, sustainability, design, glass-beverage interactions, consumer experience


JEL classifications

L15 , L61 , L66


URI

http://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/1396


DOI


Pages

131-142


Funding


This is an open access issue and all published articles are licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Authors

Dubis, Damian
State Academy of Applied Sciences in Krosno, Krosno, Poland https://pans.krosno.pl
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Baran, Jolanta
State Academy of Applied Sciences in Krosno, Krosno, Poland https://pans.krosno.pl
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Journal title

Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues

Volume

13


Number

3


Issue date

March 2026


Issue DOI


ISSN

ISSN 2345-0282 (online)


Publisher

VšĮ Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, Vilnius, Lithuania

Cited

Google Scholar

Article views & downloads

HTML views: 657  |  PDF downloads: 602

References


Bin Ali, A., Liem, A., & Isa, S. S. (2025). Meaning-Making in Design Process: The Analytical Meaning-Making Behind Industrial Designers’ Design Activities. The International Journal of Design Management and Professional Practice, 19(2), 83–114. https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-162X/CGP/v19i02/83-114

Search via ReFindit


Blackmore, H., Hidrio, C., & Yeomans, M. R. (2022). How sensory and hedonic expectations shape perceived properties of regular and non-alcoholic beer. Food Quality and Preference, 99, 104562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104562

Search via ReFindit


Borsci, S., Federici, S., Bacci, S., Gnaldi, M., & Bartolucci, F. (2015). Assessing User Satisfaction in the Era of User Experience: Comparison of the SUS, UMUX, and UMUX-LITE as a Function of Product Experience. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(8), 484–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1064648

Search via ReFindit


Casales-Garcia, V., Gonzalez-Abril, L., Veflen, N., & Velasco, C. (2023). Assessing the influence of colour and glass type on beer expectations. Food Quality and Preference, 103, 104701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104701

Search via ReFindit


Chien, C.-F., Kerh, R., Lin, K.-Y., & Yu, A. P.-I. (2016). Data-driven innovation to capture user-experience product design: An empirical study for notebook visual aesthetics design. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 99, 162–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.07.006

Search via ReFindit


Cliff, M. A. (2001). Influence of Wine Glass Shape on Perceived Aroma and Colour Intensity in Wines. Journal of Wine Research, 12(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571260120069741

Search via ReFindit


Dubis, D., & Baran, J. (2025). Sensory marketing: The influence of glass shape on the perception of beer by the consumers. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 13(1), 142–154. https://doi.org/10.9770/j4355254776

Search via ReFindit


Elzinga, K. G., Tremblay, C. H., & Tremblay, V. J. (2015). Craft Beer in the United States: History, Numbers, and Geography. Journal of Wine Economics, 10(3), 242–274. https://doi.org/10.1017/jwe.2015.22

Search via ReFindit


Gonzalez Viejo, C., Fuentes, S., De Anda-Lobo, I. C., & Hernandez-Brenes, C. (2022). Remote sensory assessment of beer quality based on visual perception of foamability and biometrics compared to standard emotional responses from affective images. Food Research International, 156, 111341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111341

Search via ReFindit


Hernández-Mora, Y. N., Verde-Calvo, J. R., Malpica-Sánchez, F. P., & Escalona-Buendía, H. B. (2022). Consumer Studies: Beyond Acceptability—A Case Study with Beer. Beverages, 8(4), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages8040080

Search via ReFindit


Langfield, T., Pechey, R., Pilling, M. A., & Marteau, T. M. (2022). Glassware design and drinking behaviours: A review of impact and mechanisms using a new typology of drinking behaviours. Health Psychology Review, 16(1), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2020.1842230

Search via ReFindit


Lewis, J. R., & Sauro, J. (2021). Usability and User Experience: Design and Evaluation. W G. Salvendy & W. Karwowski (Red.), Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics (1. wyd., s. 972–1015). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119636113.ch38

Search via ReFindit


Li, J., Cao, H., Lin, L., Hou, Y., Zhu, R., & El Ali, A. (2024). User Experience Design Professionals’ Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642114

Search via ReFindit


Lin, C. J., & Cheng, L.-Y. (2017). Product attributes and user experience design: How to convey product information through user-centered service. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 28(7), 1743–1754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-015-1095-8

Search via ReFindit


Lindgaard, G., & Dudek, C. (2003). What is this evasive beast we call user satisfaction? Interacting with Computers, 15(3), 429–452. 00063-2 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(02)

Search via ReFindit


Manska, G. F. (2018). Technical Report—Applying Physics and Sensory Sciences to Spirits Nosing Vessel Design to Improve Evaluation Diagnostics and Drinking Enjoyment. Beverages, 4(4), 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages4040093

Search via ReFindit


McLellan, S., Muddimer, A., & Peres, S. C. (2012). The effect of experience on system usability scale ratings. J. Usability Studies, 7(2), 56–67.

Search via ReFindit


Mehta, A., Serventi, L., Kumar, L., Viejo, C. G., Fuentes, S., & Torrico, D. D. (2022). Influence of expectations and emotions raised by packaging characteristics on orange juice acceptability and choice. Food Packaging and Shelf Life, 33, 100926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2022.100926

Search via ReFindit


Merlino, M. V., Blanc, S., Massaglia, S., Borra, D. (2020). Innovation in craft beer packaging: Evaluation of consumer perception and acceptance. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 5(3), 422–433. https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2020.3.422

Search via ReFindit


Mirabito, A., Oliphant, M., Van Doorn, G., Watson, S., & Spence, C. (2017). Glass shape influences the flavour of beer. Food Quality and Preference, 62, 257–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.05.009

Search via ReFindit


Nieto-Villegas, R., Bernabéu, R., & Rabadán, A. (2024). Effects on beer attribute preferences of consumers’ attitudes towards sustainability: The case of craft beer and beer packaging. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 15, 101050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101050

Search via ReFindit


PN-A-79093-1:2000/Ap1:2002P Piwo—Metody badań—Ocena sensoryczna.

Search via ReFindit


PN-A-79095 Piwo—Pobieranie i przygotowywanie próbek.

Search via ReFindit


PN-ISO 4121:1998 Analiza sensoryczna. Metodologia. Ocena produktów żywnościowych przy użyciu metod skalowania.

Search via ReFindit


PN-ISO 6658:1998 Analiza sensoryczna. Metodologia. Wytyczne ogólne.

Search via ReFindit


Pomeranz, J. L., & Brownell, K. D. (2014). Can Government Regulate Portion Sizes? New England Journal of Medicine, 371(21), 1956–1958. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1410076

Search via ReFindit


Ribeiro, M. N., Carvalho, I. A., De Sousa, M. M. M., Coelho, L. M., De Rezende, D. C., & Pinheiro, A. C. M. (2021). Visual expectation of craft beers in different glass shapes. Journal of Sensory Studies, 36(1), e12618. https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.12618

Search via ReFindit


Sandilya, S., Oroya, N., Moral, T., & Vázquez-Araújo, L. (2023). Effect of Recipient’s Tactile Properties and Expectations on Beer Perception. Beverages, 9(3), 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages9030075

Search via ReFindit


Sester, C., Dacremont, C., Deroy, O., & Valentin, D. (2013). Investigating consumers’ representations of beers through a free association task: A comparison between packaging and blind conditions. Food Quality and Preference, 28(2), 475–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.11.005

Search via ReFindit


Spence, C. (2023). Explaining Visual Shape–Taste Crossmodal Correspondences. Multisensory Research, 36(4), 313–345. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134808-bja10096

Search via ReFindit


Spence, C., & Doorn, G. V. (2017, września). Does the shape of the drinking receptacle influence taste/flavour perception? A review. Beverages, 3(3), 33; https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages3030033

Search via ReFindit


Stanisz, A. (2006). Przystępny kurs statystyki z wykorzystaniem programu STATISTICA PL na przykładach z medycyny. T. I. Statystyki podstawowe (T. 1). Statsoft.

Search via ReFindit


Troy, D. M., Maynard, O. M., Hickman, M., Attwood, A. S., & Munafò, M. R. (2015). The effect of glass shape on alcohol consumption in a naturalistic setting: A feasibility study. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 1(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-015-0022-2

Search via ReFindit


Van Doorn, G., Timora, J., Watson, S., Moore, C., & Spence, C. (2019). The visual appearance of beer: A review concerning visually-determined expectations and their consequences for perception. Food Research International, 126, 108661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108661

Search via ReFindit


Yang, S., & Raghubir, P. (2005). Can bottles speak volumes? The effect of package shape on how much to buy. Journal of Retailing, 81(4), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2004.11.003

Search via ReFindit