ESC
Clarivate

 
Source: Journal Citation ReportsTM from ClarivateTM 2022

Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues Open access
Journal Impact FactorTM (2022) 1.7
Journal Citation IndicatorTM (2022) 0.42
Received: 2023-10-11  |  Accepted: 2024-01-14  |  Published: 2024-03-30

Title

Delphi method application for evaluation of innovative product development scenario


Abstract

The authors had the idea to apply the Delphi method to evaluate innovative product development scenarios. For this purpose, questionnaires were prepared, and two rounds of the investigation were carried out, in which 30 experts participated as the respondents to evaluate factors related to innovative product development scenarios. A set of the factors and sub-factors to be assessed was selected for the research. This set was formed as the basis from the paper's authors' collected and summarised data. After analysis of obtained research results, it was found that the successful introduction of an innovative product to the market, strategic agility, and reduction of uncertainty scenario is favourable. Also, it was found that there is a significant difference in the experts' opinions on what parameters should be a priority. The options have to rely on a few experts' opinions to evaluate objectively and select the best innovative product development scenario. Then, using their average evaluation as a basis for possible options selection is good. Based on the research results, a model of innovative product development and implementation using scenarios was created. This model describes a possible scenario development path choice, scenario development, evaluation, selection, adaptation and implementation. In the article, the authors also suggest adopting the concept of green innovation in product development, as green innovation positively impacts the growth of the modern economy.


Keywords

Delphi method, innovative product, development, scenario, green innovation


JEL classifications

D22 , D24 , J28 , O14 , O31 , O33


URI

http://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/1161


DOI


Pages

37-49


Funding


This is an open access issue and all published articles are licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Authors

Toločka, Eligijus
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VILNIUS TECH), Vilnius, Lithuania https://vilniustech.lt
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Maceika, Augustinas
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VILNIUS TECH), Vilnius, Lithuania https://vilniustech.lt
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Journal title

Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues

Volume

11


Number

3


Issue date

March 2024


Issue DOI


ISSN

ISSN 2345-0282 (online)


Publisher

VšĮ Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, Vilnius, Lithuania

Cited

Google Scholar

Article views & downloads

HTML views: 166  |  PDF downloads: 101

References


Avagyan, V., Camacho, N., Van der Stede, W.A., & Stremersch, S. (2022). Financial projections in innovation selection: The role of scenario presentation, expertise, and risk. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 39(3), 907-926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2021.10.009

Search via ReFindit


Banelienė, R., & Strazdas, R. (2023). Green Innovation for Competitiveness: Impact on GDP Growth in the European Union. Contemporary Economics, 17(1), 92-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.501

Search via ReFindit


Bertonia, A., Machchhar, R.J., Larsson, T., & Frank, B. (2022). Digital Twins of Operational Scenarios in Mining for Design of Customized Product-Service Systems Solutions. Procedia CIRP, 109, 532-537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.05.290

Search via ReFindit


Brandao, M.S., & Godinho-Filho, M. (2022). Is a multiple supply chain management perspective a new way to manage global supply chains toward sustainability? Journal of Cleaner Production, 375, 134046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134046

Search via ReFindit


Calleo, Y, & Pilla, F. (2023). Delphi-based future scenarios: A bibliometric analysis of climate change case studies. Futures, 149, 103143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2023.103143

Search via ReFindit


Castaneda, M., Herrera, M.M., & M´endez-Morales, A. (2023). A simulation-based approach for assessing the innovation barriers in the manufacturing firms. Technology in Society, 75, 102391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102391

Search via ReFindit


Ding, W., & Ding, J. (2022). New venture’s product innovativeness strategy, institutional environment and new product performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121211

Search via ReFindit


Dreher, S., & Oesterle, M.-J. (2022). Ramp-up of New Products in International Manufacturing Networks: Exploring Coordination Challenges Based on a Multiple Case Study. Procedia CIRP, 107, 1355-1360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.05.157

Search via ReFindit


Farooq, U., Wen, J., Mosab, I. Tabash, M.I., & Fadoul, M. (2024). Environmental regulations and capital investment: Does green innovation allow to grow? International Review of Economics & Finance, 89(A), 878-893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.08.010

Search via ReFindit


Farrow, E. (2022). Determining the human to AI workforce ratio – Exploring future organisational scenarios and the implications for anticipatory workforce planning. Technology in Society, 68, 101879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101879

Search via ReFindit


Giménez-Medina, M., Enríquez, J.G., Olivero, M.A., & Domínguez-Mayo, F.J. (2023). The innovation challenge in Spain: A Delphi study. Expert Systems with Applications, 230, 120611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120611

Search via ReFindit


Hallstedt, S.I. (2017). Sustainability criteria and sustainability compliance index for decision support in product development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 251-266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.068

Search via ReFindit


Hassan, M.F., Saman, M.Z.M., Sharif, S., & Omar, B. (2012). An integrated MA-AHP approach for selecting the highest sustainability index of a new product. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 57, 236-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1180

Search via ReFindit


Helm, R., & Gritsch, S. (2014). Examining the influence of uncertainty on marketing mix strategy elements in emerging business to business export-markets. International Business Review, 23(2), 418-428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.06.007

Search via ReFindit


Hummen, T., & Sudheshwar, A. (2023). Fitness of product and service design for closed-loop material recycling: A framework and indicator. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 190, 106661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106661

Search via ReFindit


Ivory, S.B., & Brooks, S. B. (2018). Managing Corporate Sustainability with a Paradoxical Lens: Lessons from Strategic Agility. Journal of Business Ethics, 148, 347-361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3583-6

Search via ReFindit


Konu, H. (2015). Developing Nature-Based Tourism Products with Customers by Utilising the Delphi Method. Tourism Management Perspectives, 14, 42-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2015.03.003

Search via ReFindit


Li, K.-S., & Xiong, Y.-Q. (2022). Host country’s environmental uncertainty, technological capability, and foreign market entry mode: Evidence from high-end equipment manufacturing MNEs in emerging markets. International Business Review, 31(1), 101900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101900

Search via ReFindit


Ma, D., Yu, Q., Li, J., & Ge, M. (2021). Innovation diffusion enabler or barrier: An investigation of international patenting based on temporal exponential random graph models. Technology in Society, 64, 101456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101456

Search via ReFindit


Marchais-Roubelat, A., & Roubelat, F. (2011). The Delphi Method as a Ritual: Inquiring the Delphic Oracle. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1491-1499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.04.012

Search via ReFindit


Mata, M.N., Martins, J.M., & Inacio, P. L. (2023). Impact of absorptive capacity on project success through mediating role of strategic agility: Project complexity as a moderator. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(1), 100327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100327

Search via ReFindit


Mazzei, M.J., Flynn, C.B., & Haynie, J.J. (2016). Moving beyond initial success: Promoting innovation in small businesses through high-performance work practices. Business Horizons, 59(1), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2015.08.004

Search via ReFindit


Nathan, M., & Rosso, A. (2022). Innovative events: product launches, innovation and firm performance. Research Policy, 51(1), 104373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104373

Search via ReFindit


O'Brien, F.A., & Meadows, M. (2013). Scenario orientation and use to support strategy development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(4), 643-656. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.06.006

Search via ReFindit


Randt, N.P. (2015). An approach to product development with scenario planning: The case of aircraft design. Futures, 71, 11-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2015.06.001

Search via ReFindit


Rezk, M. R., Radwan, A., Salem, N., Sakr, M.M., & Tvaronavičienė, M. (2019). Foresight for sustainable energy policy in Egypt: results from a Delphi survey, Insights into Regional Development, 1(4), 357-369. https://doi.org/10.9770/ird.2019.1.4(6)

Search via ReFindit


Ribeiro, B. E., & Quintanilla, M.A. (2015). Transitions in Biofuel Technologies: An Appraisal of the Social Impacts of Cellulosic Ethanol Using the Delphi Method. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, 53-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.11.006

Search via ReFindit


Sivam, A., Dieguez, T., Ferreira, L.P., & Silva, F.J.G. (2019). Key settings for successful Open Innovation Arena. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 6, 507-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcde.2019.03.005

Search via ReFindit


Tarba, S.Y., Frynas, J.G., Liu, Y., Wood, G., Sarala, R.M., & Fainshmidt, S. (2023). Strategic agility in international business. Journal of World Business, 58(2), 101411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2022.101411

Search via ReFindit


Tennyson, R.D., & Breuer, K. (2002). Improving problem solving and creativity through use of complex-dynamic simulations. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(6), 650-668. 00022-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)

Search via ReFindit


Thao, H.T., & Xie, X. (2023). Fostering green innovation performance through open innovation strategies: Do green subsidies work? Environment, Development and Sustainability. Published online: 30 May 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03409-4

Search via ReFindit


Urbaniec, M., & Żur, A. (2021). Business model innovation in corporate entrepreneurship: exploratory insights from corporate accelerators. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 17, 865-888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00646-1

Search via ReFindit


Walheiser, D., Schwens, C., Steinberg, P.J., & Cadogan, J.W. (2021). Greasing the wheels or blocking the path? Organisational structure, product innovativeness, and new product success. Journal of Business Research, 126, 489-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.021

Search via ReFindit


Wang, M., Li, Y., Li, J., & Wang, Z. (2021). Green process innovation, green product innovation and its economic performance improvement paths: A survey and structural model. Journal of Environmental Management, 297, 113282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113282

Search via ReFindit


Zámborský, P., Ingršt, I., & Bhandari, K. R. (2023). Knowledge creation capability under different innovation-investment motives abroad: The knowledge-based view of international innovation management. Technovation, 127, 102829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102829

Search via ReFindit