ESC

Clarivate

JCR Category: Business in ESCI edition

Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues Open access
Journal Impact FactorTM (2025) 1.5 Q3
Journal Citation IndicatorTM (2025) 0.25 Q4
Received: 2023-05-10  |  Accepted: 2023-08-15  |  Published: 2023-09-30

Title

Integrated Acceptance Model for On-demand Car Functions: exploring determinants of drivers' acceptance


Abstract

This research paper investigates the factors influencing drivers' acceptance of on-demand car functions (ODCFs) and proposes an integrated acceptance model specific to the ODCFs context. While limited marketing research has explored consumer responses to ODCFs, understanding the determinants of consumers' intention to accept ODCFs is crucial. Existing acceptance models, although effective in explaining variances in consumer behavior, need to be adapted and extended to enhance explanatory power in individual contexts. To address this gap, a comprehensive literature review on ODCFs and related domains was conducted, identifying 74 acceptance factors. Drawing upon the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), the Car Technology Acceptance Model (CTAM), and the identified factors, a multi-level acceptance model tailored to the ODCFs context was developed. At the meso-level, the baseline model incorporates factors such as exposure to ODCFs, domain-specific, symbolic-affective, and moral-normative factors. The micro-level pertains to distinct individual variance components, encompassing socio-demographic attributes, travel behavioral patterns, personality dispositions, and technological inclinations. These micro-level determinants exert a discernible influence on the factors situated at the meso-level of analysis. A partial model that considers cross-level influences and advocates for multi-level research to examine the contextual factors' impacts on acceptance empirically is proposed to operationalize the model. By adopting this approach, researchers can gain deeper insights into the acceptance of ODCFs and shed light on the mechanisms underlying consumer behavior in this specific context.


Keywords

on-demand car functions, acceptance model, UTAUT, CTAM, contextual factors, multi-level research


JEL classifications

M31 , O33 , Z13


URI

http://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/1108


DOI


Pages

132-163


Funding


This is an open access issue and all published articles are licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Authors

Gräsner, Tom
UCAM Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia, Murcia, Spain https://www.ucam.edu
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Vogt, Roland
FOM University of Applied Sciences, Essen, Germany https://www.fom.de
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Journal title

Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues

Volume

11


Number

1


Issue date

September 2023


Issue DOI


ISSN

ISSN 2345-0282 (online)


Publisher

VšĮ Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, Vilnius, Lithuania

Cited

Google Scholar

Article views & downloads

HTML views: 4322  |  PDF downloads: 1927

References


Abd Aziz, S. (2016). Does fear of new car technologies influence brand loyalty relationship. Journal of Marketing Management, 4(1), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.15640/jmm.v4n1a12

Search via ReFindit


Adell, E. (2010). Acceptance of driver support systems. Proceedings of the European Conference on Human Centred Design for Intelligent Transport Systems, 2, 475–486

Search via ReFindit


Adnan, N., Nordin, S. M., bin Bahruddin, M. A., & Ali, M. (2018). How trust can drive forward the user acceptance to the technology? In-vehicle technology for autonomous vehicle. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 118, 819–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.10.019

Search via ReFindit


Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. 90020-T https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)

Search via ReFindit


Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. The Handbook of Attitudes, 173(221), 31.

Search via ReFindit


Atasoy, O., & Morewedge, C. K. (2018). Digital goods are valued less than physical goods. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(6), 1343–1357. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx102

Search via ReFindit


Balasubraman, S., Peterson, R. A., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (2002). Exploring the implications of m-commerce for markets and marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(4), 348–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/009207002236910

Search via ReFindit


Bansal, P., Kockelman, K. M., & Singh, A. (2016). Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: An Austin perspective. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 67, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.019

Search via ReFindit


Blodgett, J. G., Hill, D. J., & Tax, S. S. (1997). The effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on postcomplaint behavior. Journal of Retailing, 73(2), 185–210. 90003-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-4359(97)

Search via ReFindit


Blut, M., Chong, A. Y. L., Tsigna, Z., & Venkatesh, V. (2022). Meta-Analysis of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Challenging its Validity and Charting a Research Agenda in the Red Ocean. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 23(1), 13–95. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00719

Search via ReFindit


Bosler, M., Burr, W., & Ihring, L. (2018). Vernetzte Fahrzeuge – empirische Analyse digitaler Geschäftsmodelle für Connected-Car-Services. HMD Praxis Der Wirtschaftsinformatik, 55(2), 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1365/s40702-018-0396-8

Search via ReFindit


Brown, S. A., Dennis, A. R., & Venkatesh, V. (2010). Predicting collaboration technology use: Integrating technology adoption and collaboration research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(2), 9–54. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4061120

Search via ReFindit


Buckley, L., Kaye, S.-A., & Pradhan, A. K. (2018). Psychosocial factors associated with intended use of automated vehicles: A simulated driving study. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 115, 202–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.021

Search via ReFindit


Burton-Jones, A., & Straub Jr, D. W. (2006). Reconceptualizing system usage: An approach and empirical test. Information Systems Research, 17(3), 228–246. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0096

Search via ReFindit


Carter, L., & Schaupp, L. C. (2008). Efficacy and acceptance in e-file adoption. AMCIS 2008 Proceedings, 320. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-162-1.ch015

Search via ReFindit


Chan, W. M., & Lee, J. W. C. (2021). 5g connected autonomous vehicle acceptance: the mediating effect of trust in the technology acceptance model. Asian Journal of Business Research, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.14707/ajbr.210098

Search via ReFindit


Chanias, S., & Hess, T. (2016). Understanding digital transformation strategy formation: Insights from Europe’s automotive industry. http://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2016/296

Search via ReFindit


Chen, C.-F. (2019). Factors affecting the decision to use autonomous shuttle services: Evidence from a scooter-dominant urban context. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 67, 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.10.016

Search via ReFindit


Chen, N. H. (2019). Extending a TAM–TTF model with perceptions toward telematics adoption. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 31(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-02-2018-0074

Search via ReFindit


Cho, Y., Park, J., Park, S., & Jung, E. S. (2017). Technology Acceptance Modeling based on User Experience for Autonomous Vehicles Corresponding Author. Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 36(2), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2017.36.2.87

Search via ReFindit


Christensen, C. M. (2011). The innovator’s dilemma: Warum etablierte Unternehmen den Wettbewerb um bahnbrechende Innovationen verlieren. Vahlen. https://doi.org/10.15358/9783800642816-239

Search via ReFindit


Compeau, D., Higgins, C. A., & Huff, S. (1999). Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly, 145–158. https://doi.org/10.2307/249749

Search via ReFindit


Coppola, R., & Morisio, M. (2016). Connected car: Technologies, issues, future trends. ACM Computing Surveys, 49(3). https://doi.org/10.1145/2971482

Search via ReFindit


Cziehso, G. P., Schaefers, T., & Kukar-Kinney, M. (2019). Free no more-investigating customer reactions to unexpected free-to-fee switches. Journal of Business Research, 101, 229–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.050

Search via ReFindit


Davis, F. D. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/15192

Search via ReFindit


Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Search via ReFindit


Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111–1132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x

Search via ReFindit


Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. https://doi.org/10.2307/2065853

Search via ReFindit


Fraedrich, E., & Lenz, B. (2014). Automated Driving. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2416(1), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.3141/2416-08

Search via ReFindit


Garbas, J., Schubach, S., Mende, M., Scott, M. L., & Schumann, J. H. (2022). You want to sell this to me twice!? How perceptions of betrayal may undermine internal product upgrades. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-022-00881-8

Search via ReFindit


Garidis, K., Ulbricht, L., Rossmann, A., & Schmäh, M. (2020). Toward a User Acceptance Model of Autonomous Driving. Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/63909

Search via ReFindit


Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 213–236. https://doi.org/10.2307/249689

Search via ReFindit


Grégoire, Y., & Fisher, R. J. (2008). Customer betrayal and retaliation: when your best customers become your worst enemies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0054-0

Search via ReFindit


Hampton-Sosa, W. (2019). The Access Model for Music and the Effect of Modification, Trial, and Sharing Usage Rights on Streaming Adoption and Piracy. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 14(3), 126–155. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-18762019000300108

Search via ReFindit


Hanesch, A., Brune, P., & Gewald, H. (2022). Will They Like It? – Understanding Customer Adoption of Connected Car Services within Automotive Aftersales. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, 57 LNISO, 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10902-7_8

Search via ReFindit


Herrenkind, B., Nastjuk, I., Brendel, A. B., Trang, S., & Kolbe, L. M. (2019). Young people’s travel behavior–Using the life-oriented approach to understand the acceptance of autonomous driving. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 74, 214–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.07.023

Search via ReFindit


Hewitt, C., Politis, I., Amanatidis, T., & Sarkar, A. (2019). Assessing public perception of self-driving cars: The autonomous vehicle acceptance model. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 518–527. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301275.3302268

Search via ReFindit


Hill, C. W. L., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2003). The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040712

Search via ReFindit


Hudson, J., Orviska, M., & Hunady, J. (2019). People’s attitudes to autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 121, 164–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.018

Search via ReFindit


Juehling, E., Torney, M., Herrmann, C., & Droeder, K. (2010). Integration of automotive service and technology strategies. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 3(2), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2010.02.002

Search via ReFindit


Kaur, K., & Rampersad, G. (2018). Trust in driverless cars: Investigating key factors influencing the adoption of driverless cars. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 48, 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2018.04.006

Search via ReFindit


Kaye, S.-A., Lewis, I., Forward, S., & Delhomme, P. (2020). A priori acceptance of highly automated cars in Australia, France, and Sweden: A theoretically-informed investigation guided by the TPB and UTAUT. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 137, 105441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105441

Search via ReFindit


Kim, J., Kim, S., & Nam, C. (2016). User resistance to acceptance of In-Vehicle Infotainment (IVI) systems. Telecommunications Policy, 40(9), 919–930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2016.07.006

Search via ReFindit


Kim, N., Park, Y., & Lee, D. (2019). Differences in consumer intention to use on-demand automobile-related services in accordance with the degree of face-to-face interactions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 139, 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.014

Search via ReFindit


Kwon, S., Ha, S., & Kowal, C. (2017). How online self-customization creates identification: Antecedents and consequences of consumer-customized product identification and the role of product involvement. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.051

Search via ReFindit


Kyriakidis, M., Happee, R., & de Winter, J. C. F. (2015). Public opinion on automated driving: Results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 32, 127–140. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2506579

Search via ReFindit


Lee, C., Ward, C., Raue, M., D’Ambrosio, L., & Coughlin, J. F. (2017). Age differences in acceptance of self-driving cars: A survey of perceptions and attitudes. Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Aging, Design and User Experience: Third International Conference, ITAP 2017, Held as Part of HCI International 2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 9-14, 2017, Proceedings, Part I 3, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58530-7_1

Search via ReFindit


Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. T. (2003). The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.01250

Search via ReFindit


Leicht, T., Chtourou, A., & Ben Youssef, K. (2018). Consumer innovativeness and intentioned autonomous car adoption. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 29(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2018.04.001

Search via ReFindit


Li, W., Wu, G., Yao, D., Zhang, Y., Barth, M. J., & Boriboonsomsin, K. (2021). Stated acceptance and behavioral responses of drivers towards innovative connected vehicle applications. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106095

Search via ReFindit


Liang, Y., Zhang, G., Xu, F., & Wang, W. (2020). User Acceptance of Internet of Vehicles Services: Empirical Findings of Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) and Fuzzy Sets Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA). Mobile Information Systems, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6630906

Search via ReFindit


Liu, P., Guo, Q., Ren, F., Wang, L., & Xu, Z. (2019). Willingness to pay for self-driving vehicles: Influences of demographic and psychological factors. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 100, 306–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.01.022

Search via ReFindit


Ma, Z., Gill, T., & Jiang, Y. (2015). Core versus Peripheral Innovations: The Effect of Innovation Locus on Consumer Adoption of New Products. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(3), 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.13.0337

Search via ReFindit


Madigan, R., Louw, T., Wilbrink, M., Schieben, A., & Merat, N. (2017). What influences the decision to use automated public transport? Using UTAUT to understand public acceptance of automated road transport systems. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 50, 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.07.007

Search via ReFindit


McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334–359. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81

Search via ReFindit


McLeod, A., Pippin, S., & Catania, V. (2009). Using technology acceptance theory to model individual differences in tax software use. AMCIS 2009 Proceedings. 811. http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2009/811

Search via ReFindit


Meuter, M. L., Ostrom, A. L., Roundtree, R. I., & Bitner, M. J. (2000). Self-service technologies: understanding customer satisfaction with technology-based service encounters. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.64.3.50.18024

Search via ReFindit


Najm, W., Stearns, M., Howarth, H., Koopmann, J., Hitz, J. S., & others. (2006). Evaluation of an automotive rear-end collision avoidance system. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/4307

Search via ReFindit


Namkung, Y., & Jang, S. S. (2009). The effects of interactional fairness on satisfaction and behavioral intentions: Mature versus non-mature customers. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 28(3), 397–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2008.11.001

Search via ReFindit


Nastjuk, I., Herrenkind, B., Marrone, M., Brendel, A. B., & Kolbe, L. M. (2020). What drives the acceptance of autonomous driving? An investigation of acceptance factors from an end-user’s perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120319

Search via ReFindit


Nazari, F., Noruzoliaee, M., & Mohammadian, A. K. (2018). Shared versus private mobility: Modeling public interest in autonomous vehicles accounting for latent attitudes. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 97, 456–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.11.005

Search via ReFindit


Neufeld, D. J., Dong, L., & Higgins, C. (2007). Charismatic leadership and user acceptance of information technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 16, 494–510. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000682

Search via ReFindit


Ng, I. C. L., & Wakenshaw, S. Y. L. (2017). The Internet-of-Things: Review and research directions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.003

Search via ReFindit


Nguyen, B., & others. (2013). Retail fairness: Exploring consumer perceptions of fairness towards retailers’ marketing tactics. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20(3), 311–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.02.001

Search via ReFindit


Noraga, D., Batu, L., & Alversia, Y. (2021). UTAUT2 Analysis on the Use of On-Demand Services Application with Perceived Privacy as Moderating Effect. In Proceedings of the 5th Global Conference on Business, Management and Entrepreneurship (GCBME 2020). 5th Global Conference on Business, Management and Entrepreneurship (GCBME 2020). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.210831.104

Search via ReFindit


Nordhoff, S., De Winter, J., Kyriakidis, M., Van Arem, B., & Happee, R. (2018). Acceptance of driverless vehicles: Results from a large cross-national questionnaire study. Journal of Advanced Transportation https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5382192

Search via ReFindit


Nordhoff, S., Kyriakidis, M., van Arem, B., & Happee, R. (2019). A multi-level model on automated vehicle acceptance (MAVA): a review-based study. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 20(6), 682–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2019.1621406

Search via ReFindit


Nordhoff, S., Louw, T., Innamaa, S., Lehtonen, E., Beuster, A., Torrao, G., Bjorvatn, A., Kessel, T., Malin, F., Happee, R., & Merat, N. (2020). Using the UTAUT2 model to explain public acceptance of conditionally automated (L3) cars: A questionnaire study among 9,118 car drivers from eight European countries. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 74, 280–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.07.015

Search via ReFindit


Nordhoff, S., Van Arem, B., & Happee, R. (2016). Conceptual model to explain, predict, and improve user acceptance of driverless podlike vehicles. Transportation Research Record, 2602(1), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.3141/2602-08

Search via ReFindit


Osswald, S., Wurhofer, D., Trösterer, S., Beck, E., & Tscheligi, M. (2012). Predicting information technology usage in the car. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications - AutomotiveUI ’12, 51. https://doi.org/10.1145/2390256.2390264

Search via ReFindit


Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. John Wiley & Sons.

Search via ReFindit


Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., Nandavar, S., & Haworth, N. (2019). How do perceptions of risk and other psychological factors influence the use of in-vehicle information systems (IVIS)? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 67, 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.10.011

Search via ReFindit


Panagiotopoulos, I., & Dimitrakopoulos, G. (2018). An empirical investigation on consumers’ intentions towards autonomous driving. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 95, 773–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.08.013

Search via ReFindit


Park, J., Kim, J., Nam, C., & Kim, S. (2013). Driver’s Intention to Use Smartphone-Car Connectivity. In Technology, Investment and Uncertainty. International Telecommunications Society. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/88467

Search via ReFindit


Pavlou, P. A., & Fygenson, M. (2006). Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. MIS Quarterly, 115–143. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148720

Search via ReFindit


Peck, J., & Shu, S. B. (2009). The effect of mere touch on perceived ownership. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(3), 434–447. https://doi.org/10.1086/598614

Search via ReFindit


Petry, L. F., & Moormann, J. (2020). Mobile Payment in the Connected Car: Developing Services Based on Process Thinking. Business Systems Research, 11(3), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.2478/bsrj-2020-0027

Search via ReFindit


Piccinini, E., Hanelt, A., Gregory, R.W., & Kolbe, L.M. (2015). Transforming Industrial Business: The Impact of Digital Transformation on Automotive Organizations. International Conference on Interaction Sciences. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:16956865

Search via ReFindit


Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7(1), 84–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.84

Search via ReFindit


Raddats, C., Kowalkowski, C., Benedettini, O., Burton, J., & Gebauer, H. (2019). Servitization: A contemporary thematic review of four major research streams. Industrial Marketing Management, 83, 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.03.015

Search via ReFindit


Razak, S. F. A., Yogarayan, S., Abdullah, M. F. A., & Azman, A. (2022). Modeling User Acceptance of In‐Vehicle Applications for Safer Road Environment. Future Internet, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/fi14050148

Search via ReFindit


Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations, 4th Edition. Simon and Schuster.

Search via ReFindit


Schaefers, T., Leban, M., & Vogt, F. (2022). On-demand features: Consumer reactions to tangibility and pricing structure. Journal of Business Research, 139, 751–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.054

Search via ReFindit


Schaupp, L. C., Carter, L., & McBride, M. E. (2010). E-file adoption: A study of US taxpayers’ intentions. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 636–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.12.017

Search via ReFindit


Seeger, G., & Bick, M. (2013). Mega and Consumer Trends - Towards Car-independent Mobile Applications. 2013 International Conference on Mobile Business. 27. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icmb2013/27/

Search via ReFindit


Souders, D., & Charness, N. (2016). Challenges of older drivers’ adoption of advanced driver assistance systems and autonomous vehicles. Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Healthy and Active Aging: Second International Conference, ITAP 2016, Held as Part of HCI International 2016 Toronto, ON, Canada, July 17–22, 2016, Proceedings, Part II 2, 428–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39949-2_41

Search via ReFindit


Sterk, F., Dann, D., & Weinhardt, C. (2022). Monetizing Car Data: A Literature Review on Data-Driven Business Models in the Connected Car Domain. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/79581

Search via ReFindit


Stiegemeier, D., Bringeland, S., Kraus, J., & Baumann, M. (2022). “Do I really need it?”: An explorative study of acceptance and usage of in-vehicle technology. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 84, 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.11.011

Search via ReFindit


Svangren, M. K., Skov, M. B., & Kjeldskov, J. (2017). The connected car: an empirical study of electric cars as mobile digital devices. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3098279.3098535

Search via ReFindit


Tian, D., Wu, G., Boriboonsomsin, K., & Barth, M. J. (2018). Performance Measurement Evaluation Framework and Co-Benefit/Tradeoff Analysis for Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAV) Applications: A Survey. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 10(3), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITS.2018.2842020

Search via ReFindit


Trübswetter, N., & Bengler, K. (2013). Why should I use ADAS? Advanced driver assistance systems and the elderly: knowledge, experience and usage barriers. Driving Assesment Conference, 7(2013). https://doi.org/10.17077/drivingassessment.1532

Search via ReFindit


Ülkü, S., Dimofte, C. V, & Schmidt, G. M. (2012). Consumer valuation of modularly upgradeable products. Management Science, 58(9), 1761–1776. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1519

Search via ReFindit


Vafaei-Zadeh, A., Ng, S.-X., Hanifah, H., Teoh, A. P., & Nawaser, K. (2021). Safety Technology Adoption: Predicting Intention to Use Car Dashcams in an Emerging Country. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 18(05). https://doi.org/10.1142/S021987702150022X

Search via ReFindit


Venkatesh, Morris, Davis, & Davis. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Search via ReFindit


Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4062395

Search via ReFindit


Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412

Search via ReFindit


Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328–376. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00428

Search via ReFindit


Walter, J., & Abendroth, B. (2020). On the role of informational privacy in connected vehicles: A privacy-aware acceptance modelling approach for connected vehicular services. Telematics and Informatics, 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101361

Search via ReFindit


Wiegand, N., & Imschloss, M. (2021). Do You Like What You (Can’t) See? The Differential Effects of Hardware and Software Upgrades on High-Tech Product Evaluations. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 56, 18–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2021.03.004

Search via ReFindit


Winter, K., Cats, O., Martens, K., & van Arem, B. (2017). A stated-choice experiment on mode choice in an era of free-floating carsharing and shared autonomous vehicles. TRB 96th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers. https://doi.org/10.1109/mtits.2017.8005630

Search via ReFindit


Xia, L., Monroe, K. B., & Cox, J. L. (2004). The price is unfair! A conceptual framework of price fairness perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.4.1.42733

Search via ReFindit


Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971

Search via ReFindit


Xu, Z., Zhang, K., Min, H., Wang, Z., Zhao, X., & Liu, P. (2018). What drives people to accept automated vehicles? Findings from a field experiment. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 95, 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.07.024

Search via ReFindit


Yang, F., Li, J., Lei, T., & Wang, S. (2017). Architecture and key technologies for Internet of Vehicles: a survey. Journal of Communications and Information Networks, 2(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41650-017-0018-6

Search via ReFindit


Yeap, J. A. L., Yapp, E. H. T., & Balakrishna, C. (2017). User acceptance of on-demand services. 2017 International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/icriis.2017.8002535

Search via ReFindit


Yoon, S. Bin, & Cho, E. (2016). Convergence adoption model (CAM) in the context of a smart car service. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.082

Search via ReFindit


Yu, Z., & Cai, K. (2022). Perceived Risks toward In-Vehicle Infotainment Data Services on Intelligent Connected Vehicles. Systems, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10050162

Search via ReFindit


Yu, Z., & Jin, D. (2021). Determinants of users’ attitude and intention to intelligent connected vehicle infotainment in the 5g-v2x mobile ecosystem. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910069

Search via ReFindit


Zhang, B., de Winter, J., Varotto, S., Happee, R., & Martens, M. (2019). Determinants of take-over time from automated driving: A meta-analysis of 129 studies. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 64, 285–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.04.020

Search via ReFindit


Zmud, J. P., & Sener, I. N. (2017). Towards an understanding of the travel behavior impact of autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 2500–2519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.281

Search via ReFindit