ESC
Web of Science
Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues Open Access Q1
Scopus - coverage starting with 2017 material
Received: 2017-08-15  |  Accepted: 2017-11-19  |  Published: 2017-12-29

Title

Through economic growth to the viability of rural space


Abstract

Rural areas as a necessary component of living space for the population is an increasing focus both in official documents of various EU institutions and in research investigations. Both the documents and the research papers stress the necessity to enhance and maintain the viability of rural areas. The viability of rural areas is ensured by employment opportunities and the readiness of residents for active and innovative economic activity. The authors’ research focuses on an analysis of vertical and horizontal changes in entrepreneurship in the period 2009-2015 and their effects on changes in the living space in the territories analysed, which primarily involves the country’s regions, but a special focus is placed on the mentioned processes in territorial units of the regions – municipalities –, as the life of residents is influenced not only by national policies but also by on-going processes in the administrative territories of local governments. Zemgale region was chosen for an in-depth analysis of these processes. LURSOFT data for the period 2009-2015 and Central Statistical Bureau data for the period 2013-2015 were used as information sources. The data were processed by quantitative (growth) and qualitative (structural change) statistical analysis methods. The Eurostat methodology and a methodology developed by the authors for classification of industries were employed for the analysis of structural changes in the national economy. The development level-rate matrix method was employed for an in-depth examination of the research results. The research results showed that regardless of the global economic crisis, both vertical growth and positive horizontal change processes took place in the national economy in all five regions of Latvia, nine cities of national significance as well as in all 110 municipalities that composed the rural areas of Latvia. The analysis of the information allows concluding that, first, performance trends were observed in the rural space, which contributed to economic growth; second, there was no direct causal relationship between the population density of rural territories and economic activity in the rural territories; however, third, it leads to an opinion that the economic growth in the rural territories was greatly affected by the quality of local governance and local community residents’ readiness for active, innovative and inclusive action.


Keywords

living space, structural changes, knowledge-based economy, local governance, local community


JEL classifications

P25 , R11


URI

http://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/150


DOI


HAL


Pages

283-296


Funding

This research was supported by the National Research Programme EKOSOC-LV project 5.2.3 „Rural and Regional Development Processes and Opportunities in Latvia in the Context of Knowledge Economy''

This is an open access issue and all published articles are licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Authors

Rivza, Baiba
Latvia University of Agriculture, Jelgava, Latvia http://www.llu.lv
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Kruzmetra, Maiga
Latvia University of Agriculture, Jelgava, Latvia http://www.llu.lv
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Journal title

Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues

Volume

5


Number

2


Issue date

December 2017


Issue DOI


ISSN

ISSN 2345-0282 (online)


Publisher

VšĮ Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, Vilnius, Lithuania

Cited

Google Scholar

Article views & downloads

HTML views: 712  |  PDF downloads: 522

References


Azimova, S. T.; Kizatova, M. Z.; Akhmetova, S. O.; Donchenko, L. V.; Admayeva, A. M. 2017. Towards food security through application of novel scientific findings, Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues 6(4): 719-728. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2017.6.4(16)

Search via ReFindit


Bacon, B.; Brewin, D. 2016. Rural Community Viability: Lessons from 4 Communities. University of Manitoba, Canada. http://www.ruralsupport.ca/admin/FileUpload/files/publications/Oct08RuralViability.pdf

Search via ReFindit


Corrado, C. A.; Hulten, Ch. R.; Sichel, D. E. 2006. Intangible capital and economic growth. Working Paper 11948, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge http://www.nber.org/papers/w11948.pdf

Search via ReFindit


European Commission. 2016. CAP context indicators - 2016 update. https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/cap-indicators/context/2016/indicator-table_en.pdf

Search via ReFindit


EUROSTAT. 2008. NACE Rev. 2 .Statistical classification of economic activites in the European Community. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/5902521/KS-RA-07-015-EN.PDF

Search via ReFindit


Fabuš, M. 2017. Current development of business environment in Slovakia and Czech Republic, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues 5(1): 127-137. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2017.5.1(10)

Search via ReFindit


Grenčiková, A.; Guščinskienė, J.; Španková, J. 2017. The role of leadership in motivating employees in a trading company, Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues 7(2): 247-255. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2017.7.2(6)

Search via ReFindit


Grigsby, W. J. 2001. Community vitality: Some conceptual considerations. Rural Development Paper No. 6. The Northeast Regional Center for Rural Development,The Pennsylvania State University http://aese.psu.edu/nercrd/publications/rdp/rdp6.pdf

Search via ReFindit


Ignatavičius, R.; Tvaronavičienė, M.; Piccinetti, L. 2015. Sustainable development through technology transfer networks: case of Lithuania, Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues 4(3): 261-267. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2015.4.3(6)

Search via ReFindit


Innovative Rural Region. The role of human capital and technology. 2007. OECD Rural Policy Conferences Key Messages. Caceres, Spain https://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy/Innovative-Rural-Regions.pdf

Search via ReFindit


Janvry, A.; Sadoulet, E. 2007. Toward a territorial approach to rural development, eJADE 4(1): 66-98 www.fao.org/es/esa/eJADE

Search via ReFindit


Kendiukhov, I.; Tvaronavičienė, M. 2017. Managing innovations in sustainable economic growth, Marketing and Management of Innovations No 3: 33 – 42, DOI:10.21272/mmi.2017.3-03 http://mmi.fem.sumdu.edu.ua/en/journals/2017/3/33-42

Search via ReFindit


Kruzmetra, M.; Rivza, B. 2015. Socio-economic Restructuring of Rural Space - Feature of 21th Century, Socialiniai tyrimai 1(37): 67-74.

Search via ReFindit


Kruzmetra, Z. 2011. Changes in rural settelment patterns of peri-urban areas of Latvia. Summary of the Doctoral Thesis for the Degree of Doctor of Geography Subbranch: Human Geography, Riga, LU1.

Search via ReFindit


Latvija 2030. Latvijas ilgtspējīgas attīstības stratēģija līdz 2030 gadam [Latvia's Sustainable Development Strategy till 2030]. 2010. Latvijas Republikas Saeima http://www.latvija2030.lv/upload/latvija2030_saeima.pdf

Search via ReFindit


Making Bioeconomy Work for Sustainable Development. 2015. Global Bioeconomy Summit, Berlin, November 26th 2015http://gbs2015.com/fileadmin/gbs2015/Downloads/Communique_final_neu.pdf

Search via ReFindit


Making Europe Grow With its Rural Territories. 2016. Contribution to a European Rural Agenda post 2020. R.E.D www.ruraleurope.org-

Search via ReFindit


Nacionālās attīstības plāns (NAP) [National Development Plan] 2014–2020. Akceptēts LR Saeimā 20.12.2012. (in Latvian) (20.05.2017) Access: http://polsis.mk.gov.lv/documents/4247

Search via ReFindit


Naldi, L.; Nilsson, P.; Westlund, H.; Wixe, S. 2015. What is smart rural development? Journal of Rural Studies 40: 90 – 101 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.06.006

Search via ReFindit


OECD. 2005. The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Actions. 3rd ed. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/the-measurement-of-scientific-technological-and-innovation-activities_24132764

Search via ReFindit


Ricketts, K. G.; Place, N. T. 2009. Making Communities More Viable: Four Essential Factors for Successful Community Leadership. Journal of Extension 47(2) http://www.joe.org/joe/2009april/iw2.php

Search via ReFindit


Rivza, B.; Kruzmetra, M.; Zaluksne, V. 2016. Performance trends for smart growth in the rural territories of Latvia, Agronomy Research 14(5): 1684-1693. http://agronomy.emu.ee/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Vol14_nr5_Rivza.pdf

Search via ReFindit


Ryabchenko, O.; Golub, G.; Turčeková, N.; Adamičková, I., Zapototskyi, S. 2017. Sustainable business modeling of circular agriculture production: case study of circular bioeconomy, Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues 7(2): 301-309 https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2017.7.2(10)

Search via ReFindit


Schwab, K. ed. 2015. The Global Competitiveness Report 2015-2016. Geneva: World Economic Forum. Available on the Internet: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/gcr/2015-2016/Global_Competitiveness_Report_2015-2016.pdf

Search via ReFindit


Slinták, K. 2017. Mechanistic, or biotic organizations: research of organizational principles towards sustainability of social systems, Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues 7(1): 94-112. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2017.7.1(8)

Search via ReFindit


Sott, K. 2010. Community vitality. A report of the Canadian index of wellbeing. Canadian Council on Social Development (CCSD) http://www.unesco.org/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/pdf/communityvitalitydomainreport.pdf

Search via ReFindit


Svetlanská, T.; Turčeková, N.; Adamičková, I.; Skalský, R. 2017. Food security facets: case of Slovakia regions, Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues 7(2): 311-320. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2017.7.2(11)

Search via ReFindit


The Rural Challenge. 2010. Achieving sustainable rural communities for the 21st century. The Rural Coalition, London http://www.rtpi.org.uk/media/6331/the-rural-challenge-achieving-sustainable-rural-communites-for-the-21st-century-rural-coalition-2010.pdf

Search via ReFindit


Tvaronavičienė, M; Gatautis, R. (2017). Peculiarities of income distribution in selected countries. Economics and Sociology, 10(4), 113-123. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-4/9

Search via ReFindit


Tvaronavičienė, M.; Černevičiūtė, J. 2015. Technology transfer phenomenon and its impact on sustainable development, Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues 5(1): 87–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2015.5.1(7)

Search via ReFindit


Yang, J.; Černevičiūtė, J. 2017. Cultural and Creative industries (CCI) and sustainable development: China’s cultural industries clusters, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues 5(2): 231-242. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2017.5.2(6)

Search via ReFindit