References
Abrhám, J., Britchenko, I., Jankovic, M., Garškaitė-Milvydienė, K. 2018. Energy security issues in contemporary Europe, Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues 7(3): 387–398. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2018.7.3(1)
Search via ReFindit
Adamantiades, A., Kessides, I. 2009. Nuclear power for sustainable development: current status and future prospects. Energy Policy 37: 5149-5166. . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.052
Search via ReFindit
Balitskiy, S., Bilan, Y., Strielkowski, W. 2014. Energy security and economic growth in the European Union. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues 4(2): 125-132. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2014.4.2(2)
Search via ReFindit
Beck, U. 2005. Risk Society Revisited: Theory, Politics and Research Programmes, in Adam, B., Beck, U., van Loon, J., (Eds.), The Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory. Sage Publications, London, 211–229.
Search via ReFindit
Bird, D. K., Haynes, K., van den Honert, R., McAneney, J., Poortinga, W. 2014. Nuclear power in Australia: A comparative analysis of public opinion regarding climate change and the Fukushima disaster. Energy Policy 65: 644-653. . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.047
Search via ReFindit
Cottle, S. 1998. Ulrich Beck, ‘Risk Society' and the Media. A Catastrophic View? European Journal of Communication 13(1): 5-32. . https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323198013001001
Search via ReFindit
Demski, C., Poortinga, W., Pidgeon, N. 2014. Exploring public perceptions of energy security risks in the UK. Energy Policy 66: 369–378. . http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.079
Search via ReFindit
Dźwigoł, H., Dźwigoł–Barosz, M., Zhyvko, Z., Miśkiewicz, R., Pushak, H. 2019. Evaluation of the energy security as a component of national security of the country. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues 8(3): 307-317. http://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2019.8.3(2)
Search via ReFindit
Engels, A., Hüther, O., Schäfer, M., Held, H. 2013. Public climate-change skepticism, energy preferences and political participation. Globas Environmental Change 23(5): 1018-1027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.008
Search via ReFindit
Goodfellow, J. M., Dewick, P., Wortley, J., Azapagic, A. 2014. Public perceptions of design options of new nuclear plants in the UK. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 94: 72-88. . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2014.12.008
Search via ReFindit
Gorman, S., 2013. How do we perceive risk?: Paul Slovic's landmark analysis. Retrieved from . http://www.thepumphandle.org/2013/01/16/how-do-we-perceive-risk-paul-slovics-landmark-analysis-2/#.XXcvfyj7TIU
Search via ReFindit
Jewell, J., 2011. Ready for nuclear energy? An assessment of capacities and motivations for launching new national nuclear power programs. Energy Policy 39(3): 1041–1055. . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.10.041
Search via ReFindit
Juozaitis, J., 2016. Lithuanian foreign policy vis-à-vis Belarusian nuclear power plant in Ostrovets. Lithuanian Foreign Policy Review 35(1): 41-66. . https://doi.org/10.1515/lfpr-2016-0023
Search via ReFindit
Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H. S., Emel, J., Goble, R., Kasperson, J. X., Ratick, S. 1988. The social amplification of risk: a conceptual framework. Risk Analysis 8(2): 177–187. . https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x
Search via ReFindit
Kessides, N. I. 2012. The future of the nuclear industry reconsidered: risks, uncertainties, and continued promise. Energy Policy 48: 185-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.008
Search via ReFindit
Leonavičius, V., Genys, D. 2017. Energy Security Sociology. Kaunas, Lithuania: Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas. (in Lithuanian).
Search via ReFindit
Leonavičius, V., Genys, D., Krikštolaitis, R. 2018. Public Perception of Energy Security in Lithuania: Between Material Interest and Energy Independence. The Journal of Baltic Studies 49(1): 157-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/01629778.2018.1446033
Search via ReFindit
Marris, C., Langford, I., Saunderson, T., O'Riordan, T. 1997. Exploring the “psychometric paradigm”: comparisons between aggregate and individual analyses. Risk Analysis 17(3): 303-12. . https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00868.x
Search via ReFindit
Molis, A. 2011. Construction of Ostrovets Nuclear Power Plant: Whom to Trust and What to Expect? Energy Security Highlights. 74-76.
Search via ReFindit
NEA, OECD. 2010. Public Attitudes to Nuclear Power. Report (NEA No. 6859). Retrieved from https://www.oecd-nea.org/ndd/reports/2010/nea6859-public-attitudes.pdf
Search via ReFindit
Novikau, A. 2016. Nuclear power debate and public opinion in Belarus: From Chernobyl to Ostrovets. Public Understanding of Science 5: 1-14. . https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516647242
Search via ReFindit
Pidgeon, N. F., Kasperson, R., Slovic, P. 2003. The Social Amplification of Risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Search via ReFindit
Pidgeon, N. F., Lorenzoni, I., Poortinga, W. 2008. Climate change or nuclear power – no thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain. Global Environmental Change 18(1): 69-85. . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.09.005
Search via ReFindit
Poortinga, W., Aoyagi, M., Pidgeon, F. N. 2013. Public perceptions of climate change and energy futures before and after the Fukushima accident: A comparison between Britain and Japan. Energy Policy 62: 1204–1211. . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.015
Search via ReFindit
Poortinga, W., Pidgeon, N. F., Lorenzoni, I. 2006. Public perceptions of nuclear power, climate change and energy options in Britain: Summary findings of a survey conducted during October and November 2005. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research. School of Environmental Sciences. University of East Anglia. Retrieved from https://sp.ukdataservice.ac.uk/doc/5357/mrdoc/pdf/5357userguide.pdf
Search via ReFindit
Scott, A., 2005. Risk Society or Angst Society? Two Views of Risk, Consciousness and Community, in Adam, B., Beck, U., van Loon, J., (Eds.), The Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory. London: Sage Publications, 33–46.
Search via ReFindit
Siegrist, M., Sütterlin, B., Keller, C. 2014. Why have some people changed their attitudes toward nuclear power after the accident in Fukushima? Energy Polic. 69: 356-363. . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.026
Search via ReFindit
Sjöberg, L., Moen, B.-E., Rundmo, T., 2004. Explaining risk perception. An evaluation of the psychometric paradigm in risk perception research, Rotunde, Trondheim, Norway. Retrieved from http://www.svt.ntnu.no/psy/Torbjorn.Rundmo/Psychometric_paradigm.pdf
Search via ReFindit
Slovic, P. 1987. Perception of Risk. Science 236(4799): 280-285. . https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3563507
Search via ReFindit
Slovic, P. 1996. Perception of risk from radiation. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 68:(3-4), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a031860
Search via ReFindit
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Lichtenstein, S. 1986. The Psychometric Study of Risk Perception, in Covello, V.T., Menkes, J., Mumpower, J., (Eds.). Risk Evaluation and Management. Contemporary Issues in Risk Analysis, vol 1. Springer, Boston, MA.3–24. . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2103-3_1
Search via ReFindit
Tvaronavičienė, M., Nesterova, K., Kováčik, V. 2017. Energy security and long-term energy efficiency: case of selected counties. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues 7(2): 349-357. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2017.7.2(14)
Search via ReFindit
Wagner, A., Grobelski, T., Harembski, M. 2016. Is energy policy a public issue? Nuclear power in Poland and implications for energy transitions in Central and East Europe. Energy Research & Social Science 13: 158–169. . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.010
Search via ReFindit